Proxense, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
| PROXENSE, LLC |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION |
| 25-2131 |
| September 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 2025-2130 lead, with 2025-2131, 2026-1025, 2026-1291, and 2026-1292 as members. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [1139197] [25-2130, 25-2131, 26-1025, 26-1291, 26-1292] [GWK] [Entered: 01/07/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 11 Certified list received. Service: 11/03/2025 by email. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [1125419] [25-2130, 25-2131] [GWK] [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 2025-2130 lead, with 2025-2131 member. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [1119731] [25-2130, 25-2131] [GWK] [Entered: 10/07/2025 02:39 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER consolidating appeals (2025-2130 lead, with 2025-2131 member). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1119729] [25-2130, 25-2131] [GWK] [Entered: 10/07/2025 02:36 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Proxense, LLC. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119558] [25-2131] [David Hecht] [Entered: 10/06/2025 06:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Proxense, LLC. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119557] [25-2131] [David Hecht] [Entered: 10/06/2025 06:39 PM] |
| Filing 6 Entry of Appearance for David L. Hecht as counsel for Appellant Proxense, LLC. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119556] [25-2131] [David Hecht] [Entered: 10/06/2025 06:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119542] [25-2131] [Lauren Degnan] [Entered: 10/06/2025 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119541] [25-2131] [Lauren Degnan] [Entered: 10/06/2025 05:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119539] [25-2131] [Lauren Degnan] [Entered: 10/06/2025 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Lauren A. Degnan; W. Karl Renner; Christopher Dryer; Alex Yu as counsel for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119538] [25-2131] [Lauren Degnan] [Entered: 10/06/2025 05:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/18/2025. [1115974] Entry of Appearance due 10/06/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/06/2025. Docketing Statement due 10/06/2025. Certified List due on 11/03/2025. [GWK] [Entered: 09/22/2025 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Proxense, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: PROXENSE, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David Hecht |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | Walter Karl Renner Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.