Synopsys, Inc. v. Real Intent, Inc.
| SYNOPSYS, INC. |
| REAL INTENT, INC. |
| SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC. and EUGENE H. SPAFFORD |
| 25-2137 |
| September 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Copyright (Federal Question) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 14 ] filed by Appellee Real Intent, Inc.. No further extensions should be anticipated. The response brief is due 05/04/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1144258] [JSP] [Entered: 02/02/2026 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 22 MODIFIED ENTRY: AMICUS BRIEF FILED by Siemens Industry Software Inc.. Service: 01/30/2026 by email. [1144231]--[Edited 02/02/2026 by JSP - compliance review complete] [Klaus Hamm] [Entered: 01/30/2026 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 21 Certificate of Interest for Siemens Industry Software Inc.. Service: 01/30/2026 by email. [1144230] [25-2137] [Klaus Hamm] [Entered: 01/30/2026 06:37 PM] |
| Filing 20 Entry of Appearance for Klaus H. Hamm; Kristin L. Cleveland; Mark W. Wilson as counsel for Siemens Industry Software Inc.. Service: 01/30/2026 by email. [1144229] [25-2137] [Klaus Hamm] [Entered: 01/30/2026 06:34 PM] |
| Filing 19 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Service: 01/30/2026 by email. [1144211] --[Edited 02/02/2026 by JSP - compliance review complete] [E. Rosenkranz] [Entered: 01/30/2026 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 18 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED CONFIDENTIAL OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Service: 01/30/2026 by email. [1144208]--[Edited 02/02/2026 by JSP - compliance review complete] [E. Rosenkranz] [Entered: 01/30/2026 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 17 MODIFIED ENTRY: AMICUS BRIEF FILED by Eugene H. Spafford. Service: 01/30/2026 by email. [1144065]--[Edited 02/02/2026 by JSP - compliance review complete] [Cyrus Morton] [Entered: 01/30/2026 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 16 Certificate of Interest for Amicus Curiae - Eugene H. Spafford, Ph.D.. Service: 01/30/2026 by email. [1144064] [25-2137] [Cyrus Morton] [Entered: 01/30/2026 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 15 Entry of Appearance for Cyrus A. Morton as counsel for Amicus Curiae: Eugene H. Spafford, Ph.D.. Service: 01/30/2026 by email. [1144062] [25-2137] [Cyrus Morton] [Entered: 01/30/2026 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION of Appellee Real Intent, Inc. to extend the time to 05/04/2026 to file brief. Service: 01/29/2026 by email. [1143878] [25-2137] [Robert Van Nest] [Entered: 01/29/2026 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Synopsys, Inc., Nonconfidential Opening Brief, Confidential Opening Brief [ # 12 ], [11], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 02/02/2026. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1142906] [JSP] [Entered: 01/26/2026 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Service: 01/23/2026 by email. [1142637] [25-2137] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 13 ] [E. Rosenkranz] [Entered: 01/23/2026 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 11 CONFIDENTIAL OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Service: 01/23/2026 by email. [1142636] [25-2137] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 13 ] [E. Rosenkranz] [Entered: 01/23/2026 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 10 Amended Entry of Appearance for Samantha M. Leff as counsel for Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Service: 11/25/2025 by email. [1130472] [25-2137] [Samantha Leff] [Entered: 11/25/2025 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 9 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. No further extensions should be anticipated. The opening brief is due 01/23/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1124499] [JSP] [Entered: 10/29/2025 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION of Appellant Synopsys, Inc. to extend the time to 01/23/2026 to file brief. Service: 10/29/2025 by email. [1124465] [25-2137] [E. Rosenkranz] [Entered: 10/29/2025 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Real Intent, Inc.. Service: 10/08/2025 by US mail. [1120125] [25-2137] [Robert Van Nest] [Entered: 10/08/2025 06:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Real Intent, Inc.. Service: 10/08/2025 by US mail. [1120124] [25-2137] [Robert Van Nest] [Entered: 10/08/2025 05:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of Appearance for Robert A. Van Nest; Eugene M. Paige; Reid P. Mullen; Ryan K.M. Wong; Kristin Elizabeth Hucek as counsel for Appellee Real Intent, Inc.. Service: 10/08/2025 by US mail. [1120123] [25-2137] [Robert Van Nest] [Entered: 10/08/2025 05:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Service: 10/08/2025 by email. [1120115] [25-2137] [E. Rosenkranz] [Entered: 10/08/2025 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Service: 10/08/2025 by email. [1120114] [25-2137] [E. Rosenkranz] [Entered: 10/08/2025 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for E. Joshua Rosenkranz; Andrew D. Silverman; Alexandra Bursak; Lauren A. Weber; Samantha M. Leff; Krista S. Schwartz; Barrington Dyer; Dane Sowers as counsel for Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Service: 10/08/2025 by email. [1120113] [25-2137] [E. Rosenkranz] [Entered: 10/08/2025 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/19/2025. [1116759] Entry of Appearance is due on 10/08/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/08/2025. Docketing Statement is due on 10/08/2025. Appellant's brief is due on 11/24/2025. [JSP] [Entered: 09/24/2025 09:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.