Netflix, Inc. v. Broadcom Inc.
| NETFLIX, INC. |
| BROADCOM INC. and VMWARE LLC |
| 26-1005 |
| October 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 13 ] filed by Appellees Broadcom Inc. and VMware LLC. The response brief is due 05/14/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1152205] [MMA] [Entered: 03/10/2026 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION of Appellees Broadcom Inc. and VMware LLC to extend the time to 05/14/2026 to file brief. Service: 03/06/2026 by email. [1151702] [26-1005] [Charles Fowler] [Entered: 03/06/2026 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 12 MODIFIED ENTRY: OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Netflix, Inc. Service: 02/17/2026 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [1147747] --[Edited 02/24/2026 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Lauren Dreyer] [Entered: 02/17/2026 04:45 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 9 ] filed by Appellant Netflix, Inc. No further extensions of time for the opening brief should be anticipated. The opening brief is due 02/17/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1123572] [NL] [Entered: 10/24/2025 04:42 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Amended Entry of Appearance for Steven J. Rizzi; Charles E. Fowler, Jr.; Ramy E. Hanna; Christopher McNett as counsel for Appellees Broadcom Inc. and VMware LLC. Service: 10/24/2025 by email. [1123472] [26-1005] [Steven Rizzi] [Entered: 10/24/2025 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION of Appellant Netflix, Inc. to extend the time to 02/17/2026 to file brief. Service: 10/22/2025 by email. [1122734] [26-1005] [Lauren Dreyer] [Entered: 10/22/2025 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellees Broadcom Inc. and VMware LLC, Entry of Appearance [ # 5 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 10/27/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1122032] [MMA] [Entered: 10/20/2025 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Broadcom Inc. and VMware LLC. Service: 10/16/2025 by email. [1121602] [26-1005] [Steven Rizzi] [Entered: 10/16/2025 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Broadcom Inc. and VMware LLC. Service: 10/16/2025 by email. [1121601] [26-1005] [Steven Rizzi] [Entered: 10/16/2025 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of Appearance for Steven J. Rizzi; Charles E. Fowler, Jr.; Ramy E. Hanna; Christopher McNett as counsel for Appellees Broadcom Inc. and VMware LLC. Service: 10/16/2025 by email. [1121600] [26-1005] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [Steven Rizzi] [Entered: 10/16/2025 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Netflix, Inc.. Service: 10/16/2025 by email. [1121587] [26-1005] [Lauren Dreyer] [Entered: 10/16/2025 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Netflix, Inc.. Service: 10/16/2025 by email. [1121585] [26-1005] [Lauren Dreyer] [Entered: 10/16/2025 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Lauren J. Dreyer; Rachael D. Lamkin; Lori Ding as counsel for Appellant Netflix, Inc.. Service: 10/16/2025 by email. [1121583] [26-1005] [Lauren Dreyer] [Entered: 10/16/2025 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/26/2025. [1118853] Entry of Appearance due 10/16/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/16/2025. Docketing Statement due 10/16/2025. Appellant's brief is due 12/01/2025. [MMA] [Entered: 10/02/2025 12:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
