Maxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff: MAXELL, LTD.
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Case Number: 26-1111
Filed: October 29, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2026 Filing 28 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 27 ] filed by Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. No further extensions should be anticipated. The response brief is due 06/26/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1158829] [MMA] [Entered: 04/10/2026 10:43 AM]
April 8, 2026 Filing 27 MOTION of Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to extend the time to 06/26/2026 to file brief. Service: 04/08/2026 by email. [1158457] [26-1111] [Stanley Panikowski] [Entered: 04/08/2026 03:58 PM]
March 24, 2026 Filing 26 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Maxell, Ltd. Service: 03/24/2026 by email. [1155134] --[Edited 03/31/2026 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 03/24/2026 01:35 PM]
March 24, 2026 Filing 25 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED CONFIDENTIAL OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Maxell, Ltd. Service: 03/24/2026 by email. [1155132]--[Edited 03/31/2026 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 03/24/2026 01:33 PM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 24 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Maxell, Ltd., Confidential Opening Brief, Opening Brief [21], [ # 22 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/26/2026. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1154097] [MMA] [Entered: 03/19/2026 04:15 PM]
March 17, 2026 Filing 23 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant Maxell, Ltd.. Service: 03/17/2026 by email. [1153409] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 03/17/2026 12:12 AM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 22 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Maxell, Ltd.. Service: 03/16/2026 by email. [1153406] [26-1111] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 24 ] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 03/16/2026 11:58 PM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 21 CONFIDENTIAL OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Maxell, Ltd.. Service: 03/16/2026 by email. [1153405] [26-1111] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 24 ] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 03/16/2026 11:55 PM]
February 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Appeal Nos. 2026-1111, 2026-1320, and 2026-1330 shall be treated as companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel. The respective due dates for briefing are unchanged. The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this order to the merits panel assigned to these cases. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1146781] [26-1111, 26-1320, 26-1330] [NL] [Entered: 02/11/2026 05:00 PM]
February 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 18 ] filed by Appellant Maxell, Ltd. The opening brief is due 03/16/2026. No further extensions of time for the opening brief should be anticipated. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1144789] [LMS] [Entered: 02/03/2026 01:43 PM]
February 2, 2026 Filing 18 MOTION of Appellant Maxell, Ltd. to extend the time to 03/16/2026 to file brief. Service: 02/02/2026 by email. [1144528] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 02/02/2026 04:39 PM]
January 16, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER filed denying the motion [ # 11 ] without prejudice to the parties asking to companion or consolidate this appeal with any future appeal from a decision from the PTO. Maxell's opening brief remains due no later than February 12, 2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1141182] [LMS] [Entered: 01/16/2026 02:21 PM]
January 6, 2026 Filing 16 Amended Entry of Appearance for Andrew John Pincus; Jamie B. Beaber; Bryan Nese; Kfir Levy; Michael Louis Lindinger; Saqib Siddiqui; Minh Nguyen-Dang; Natasha Harnwell-Davis; Zachary Krislov; Alan M. Grimaldi as counsel for Appellant Maxell, Ltd.. Service: 01/06/2026 by email. [1138913] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 01/06/2026 04:03 PM]
January 5, 2026 Filing 15 REPLY of Appellant Maxell, Ltd. to response [ # 14 ]. Service: 01/05/2026 by email. [1138601] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 01/05/2026 07:57 PM]
December 29, 2025 Filing 14 RESPONSE of Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to Doc No. [ # 11 ]. Service: 12/29/2025 by email. [1137248] [26-1111] [Stanley Panikowski] [Entered: 12/29/2025 04:56 PM]
December 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 12 ] filed by Appellant Maxell, Ltd. The opening brief is due 02/12/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1137140] [LMS] [Entered: 12/29/2025 02:12 PM]
December 22, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION of Appellant Maxell, Ltd. to extend the time to 02/12/2026 to file brief. Service: 12/22/2025 by email. [1136328] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 12/22/2025 05:29 PM]
December 17, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION of Appellant Maxell, Ltd. to stay appeal. Service: 12/17/2025 by email. [1135417] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 12/17/2025 03:54 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 10 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellees Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127484] [26-1111] [Stanley Panikowski] [Entered: 11/12/2025 07:19 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127483] [26-1111] [Stanley Panikowski] [Entered: 11/12/2025 07:18 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127482] [26-1111] [Stanley Panikowski] [Entered: 11/12/2025 07:16 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 7 Entry of Appearance for Stanley J. Panikowski; Mark D. Fowler; Sean C. Cunningham; Erin Gibson; Erik R. Fuehrer, James H. Heintz; Michael Jay as counsel for Appellees Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127481] [26-1111] [Stanley Panikowski] [Entered: 11/12/2025 07:14 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 6 Transcript Purchase Order Form for the Appellant Maxell, Ltd. indicating that a transcript is already on file. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127479] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 11/12/2025 06:31 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 5 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Maxell, Ltd.. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127478] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 11/12/2025 06:29 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 4 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant Maxell, Ltd.. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127477] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 11/12/2025 06:28 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Maxell, Ltd.. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127475] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 11/12/2025 06:26 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Andrew John Pincus; Jamie B. Beaber; Bryan Nese; Kfir Levy; Michael Louis Lindinger; Saqib Siddiqui; Minh Nguyen-Dang; Natasha Harnwell-Davis; Zachary Krislov as counsel for Appellant Maxell, Ltd.. Service: 11/12/2025 by email. [1127473] [26-1111] [Andrew Pincus] [Entered: 11/12/2025 06:24 PM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/24/2025. [1124407] Entry of Appearance due 11/12/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 11/12/2025. Docketing Statement due 11/12/2025. Appellant's brief is due 12/29/2025. [MMA] [Entered: 10/29/2025 12:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Maxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAXELL, LTD.
Represented By: Jamie B. Beaber Esq.
Represented By: Saqib Siddiqui
Represented By: Minh Nguyen-Dang
Represented By: Bryan Nese
Represented By: Michael Louis Lindinger
Represented By: Kfir Levy
Represented By: Zachary Krislov
Represented By: Natasha Harnwell-Davis
Represented By: Andrew John Pincus
Represented By: Alan M. Grimaldi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Represented By: Mark D. Fowler Esq.
Represented By: Michael Jay
Represented By: James Martin Heintz
Represented By: Erin Gibson
Represented By: Erik Ryan Fuehrer Esq.
Represented By: Sean C. Cunningham
Represented By: Stanley Joseph Panikowski III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Mark D. Fowler Esq.
Represented By: Michael Jay
Represented By: James Martin Heintz
Represented By: Erin Gibson
Represented By: Erik Ryan Fuehrer Esq.
Represented By: Sean C. Cunningham
Represented By: Stanley Joseph Panikowski III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?