In re: Intel Corporation
| In re: INTEL CORPORATION and LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. |
| JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and USTA TECHNOLOGY, LLC |
| U.S. MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENTERPRISE, THE NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, THE HIGH TECH INVENTORS ALLIANCE, THE COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, ACT THE APP ASSOCIATION, THE SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC |
| 26-113 |
| November 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER filed denying [ # 2 ] Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Intel Corporation and Lenovo (United States) Inc. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1149016] [LMS] [Entered: 02/24/2026 09:23 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
REPLY of Petitioners Intel Corporation and Lenovo (United States) Inc. to response [ # 19 ], response [ # 18 ]. Service: 01/07/2026 by email. [1139228] [26-113] [Debra McComas] [Entered: 01/07/2026 06:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
RESPONSE of Respondent USTA Technology, LLC to Doc No. [ # 2 ]. Service: 12/22/2025 by email. [1136365] [26-113] [Derek Dahlgren] [Entered: 12/22/2025 09:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
RESPONSE of Respondent John A. Squires to Doc No. [ # 2 ]. Service: 12/22/2025 by email. [1136226] [26-113] [Fahd Patel] [Entered: 12/22/2025 02:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
Amended Entry of Appearance for Fahd H. Patel; Nicholas T. Matich; Robert J. McManus; Peter J. Sawert; Laura E. Myron; Brad Hinshelwood as counsel for Respondent John A. Squires. Service: 12/22/2025 by email. [1136224] [26-113] [Fahd Patel] [Entered: 12/22/2025 02:10 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER filed granting the motion [ # 11 ] for an extension of time. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1131532] [LMS] [Entered: 12/02/2025 09:57 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
AMICUS FILING of Amici Curiae ACT The App Association, Computer & Communications Industry Association, High Tech Inventors Alliance, National Retail Federation, Software & Information Industry Association, US*MADE and Unified Patents, LLC to Doc No. [ # 2 ]. Service: 11/28/2025 by email. [1131275] [JSP] [Entered: 12/01/2025 02:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER denying ECF No. 13 as unnecessary; Pages 7-33 of ECF No. 13 are accepted as movants' brief amicus curiae. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1131192] [LMS] [Entered: 12/01/2025 01:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION of US*MADE, the National Retail Federation, the High Tech Inventors Alliance, the Computer & Communications Industry Association, ACT|The App Association, the Software & Information Industry Association, and Unified Patents, LLC for leave to file an amicus curiae brief. Service: 11/28/2025 by email. [1131045] [26-113] [Joseph Matal] [Entered: 11/28/2025 08:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
Entry of Appearance for Joseph Matal as counsel for US*MADE, the National Retail Federation, the High Tech Inventors Alliance, the Computer & Communications Industry Association, ACT|The App Association, the Software & Information Industry Association, and Unified Patents, LLC. Service: 11/28/2025 by email. [1131044] [26-113] [Joseph Matal] [Entered: 11/28/2025 08:42 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION of Respondent USTA Technology, LLC to extend time. Service: 11/26/2025 by email. [1131007] [26-113] [Derek Dahlgren] [Entered: 11/26/2025 04:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
Notice of Related Case Information for Respondent USTA Technology, LLC. Service: 11/26/2025 by email. [1131003] [26-113] [Derek Dahlgren] [Entered: 11/26/2025 04:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
Certificate of Interest for Respondent USTA Technology, LLC. Service: 11/26/2025 by email. [1131002] [26-113] [Derek Dahlgren] [Entered: 11/26/2025 04:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
Entry of Appearance for Derek Dahlgren as counsel for Respondent USTA Technology, LLC. Service: 11/26/2025 by email. [1130991] [26-113] [Derek Dahlgren] [Entered: 11/26/2025 04:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
Entry of Appearance for Fahd H. Patel; Nicholas T. Matich; Robert J. McManus as counsel for Respondent John A. Squires. Service: 11/26/2025 by email. [1130836] [26-113] [Fahd Patel] [Entered: 11/26/2025 11:07 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and USTA Technology, LLC are directed to file separate responses to the petition [ # 2 ] no later than fourteen days from the date of entry of this order. Petitioners may submit a reply no later than three days from the date of service of the last-filed response. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1130236] [NL] [Entered: 11/24/2025 03:41 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Related Case Information for Petitioners Intel Corporation and Lenovo (United States) Inc.. Service: 11/24/2025 by clerk. [1129991] [JSP] [Entered: 11/24/2025 09:53 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
Certificate of Interest for Petitioners Intel Corporation and Lenovo (United States) Inc.. Service: 11/24/2025 by clerk. [1129986] [JSP] [Entered: 11/24/2025 09:50 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
Entry of Appearance for Debra J. McComas; Michael F. Qian; Angela M. Oliver as counsel for Petitioners Intel Corporation and Lenovo (United States) Inc.. Service: 11/24/2025 by clerk. [1129980] [JSP] [Entered: 11/24/2025 09:44 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION of Petitioners Intel Corporation and Lenovo (United States) Inc. for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 11/21/2025 by email. [1129976] [JSP] [Entered: 11/24/2025 09:42 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 11/21/2025. [1129973] Entry of Appearance is due on 12/08/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 12/08/2025. [JSP] [Entered: 11/24/2025 09:37 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
