In re: Parker
| In re: DENNIS DONALD PARKER and SUSAN TILLER PARKER |
| DONALD C. COGGINS, JR. and KEVIN F. MCDONALD |
| 26-118 |
| December 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Clerk's letter to Petitioner Dennis Donald Parker regarding cash payment. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1147744] [MVH] [Entered: 02/17/2026 04:43 PM]
|
Filing 6
ORDER The petition is dismissed, and all pending motions are denied. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1141729] [LMS] [Entered: 01/21/2026 09:28 AM]
|
Filing 5
Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and Consent to Paper Filing and Electronic Service for Petitioner Susan Tiller Parker. Service: 01/12/2026 by clerk. [1140065] [GWK] [Entered: 01/12/2026 04:58 PM]
|
Filing 4
MOTION of Petitioners Dennis Donald Parker and Susan Tiller Parker to seal document. Service: 01/12/2026 by clerk. [1140059] [GWK] [Entered: 01/12/2026 04:53 PM]
|
Filing 3
MOTION of Petitioners Dennis Donald Parker and Susan Tiller Parker to extend time. Service: 01/08/2026 by clerk. [1139393] [GWK] [Entered: 01/08/2026 03:29 PM]
|
Filing 2
PETITION of Petitioners Dennis Donald Parker and Susan Tiller Parker for a Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 12/08/2025 by US mail. [1135679] [GWK] [Entered: 12/18/2025 04:01 PM]
|
Filing 1
Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 12/11/2025. [1135677] Entry of Appearance due 01/02/2026. [GWK] [Entered: 12/18/2025 03:57 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.