Markham v. US
| JOHN W. MARKHAM |
| UNITED STATES |
| 26-1327 |
| January 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Contract - Service - (CDA) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION of Appellant John W. Markham to oppose summary affirmance. Service: 03/09/2026 by clerk. [1151785] [IMH] [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 13 REPLY of Appellee US to response [ # 12 ]. Service: 02/12/2026 by email. [1146944] [26-1327] [Geoffrey Long] [Entered: 02/12/2026 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE of Appellant John W. Markham to Doc No. [ # 6 ]. Service: 02/12/2026 by clerk. [1146842] [IMH] [Entered: 02/12/2026 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 11 Amended Notice of Appeal for John W. Markham. Service: 02/06/2026 by clerk. [1145686] [IMH] [Entered: 02/06/2026 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 10 INFORMAL BRIEF FILED by Appellant John W. Markham. Service: 02/05/2026 by clerk. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [1145266] [IMH] [Entered: 02/05/2026 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellant John W. Markham. Service: 02/05/2026 by clerk. [1145265] [IMH] [Entered: 02/05/2026 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 8 Statement Concerning Discrimination pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) for Appellant John W. Markham. Service: 02/05/2026 by clerk. [1145263] [IMH] [Entered: 02/05/2026 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 7 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and Consent to Paper Filing and Electronic Service for Appellant John W. Markham. Service: 02/05/2026 by clerk. [1145262] [IMH] [Entered: 02/05/2026 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION of Appellee US for summary affirmance. Cases to be terminated: 26-1327. (Briefing suspended pursuant to FCR 31 pending resolution of the motion).. Service: 01/21/2026 by email. [1141783] [26-1327] [Geoffrey Long] [Entered: 01/21/2026 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of Appearance for Geoffrey M. Long as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 01/21/2026 by email. [1141768] [26-1327] [Geoffrey Long] [Entered: 01/21/2026 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION of Appellant John W. Markham for this court to appoint pro bono counsel. Service: 01/12/2026 by clerk. [1139892] [IMH] [Entered: 01/12/2026 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION of Appellant John W. Markham for leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis. Service: 01/12/2026 by clerk. [1139887] [IMH] [Entered: 01/12/2026 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and Consent to Paper Filing and Electronic Service for Appellant John W. Markham. Service: 01/12/2026 by clerk. [1139886] [IMH] [Entered: 01/12/2026 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 01/08/2026. [1139879] Entry of Appearance is due on 01/26/2026. Appellant's brief is due on 03/13/2026. [IMH] [Entered: 01/12/2026 01:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Markham v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN W. MARKHAM | |
| Represented By: | John W. Markham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey M. Long |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.