Wilson Price v. Netflix, Inc.
| RENZIE WILSON PRICE |
| NETFLIX, INC., DENNIS LIU, JASON PIPERBERG, MICHAEL B. JORDAN, CHARLES D. KING, CAROL BARBEE, KIM ROTH, POPPY HANKS, KENNY GOODMAN, OUTLIER SOCIETY LLC and MACRO MEDIA LLC |
| 26-1343 |
| January 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Copyright (Federal Question) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Clerk's Letter to United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Transferred Case. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1159889] [IMH] [Entered: 04/15/2026 11:04 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER filed transferring this appeal and all case filings to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1159760] [LMS] [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
COMBINED OPENING BRIEF & APPX (FCR 30(d)) FILED by Appellant Mr. Renzie Wilson Price. Service: 03/24/2026 by clerk. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [1154970] [IMH] [Entered: 03/24/2026 09:03 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE of Appellees Carol Barbee, Kenny Goodman, Poppy Hanks, Michael B. Jordan, Charles D. King, Dennis Liu, Macro Media LLC, Netflix, Inc., Outlier Society LLC, Jason Piperberg and Kim Roth to Doc. No. [ # 7 ], [ # 7 ]. Service: 03/11/2026 by email. [1152614] [26-1343] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 03/11/2026 04:56 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE of Appellant Mr. Renzie Wilson Price to Doc. No. [ # 7 ]. Service: 03/09/2026 by clerk. [1151786] [IMH] [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:14 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Within 30 days from the date of entry of this order the parties are directed to address this court's jurisdiction, including whether this appeal should be dismissed or transferred. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is held in abeyance, and proceedings otherwise are stayed. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1146880] [LMS] [Entered: 02/12/2026 10:33 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
Notice to Appellant Mr. Renzie Wilson Price: The record of this case indicates that no Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance under FCR 47.3(b) has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1146147] [IMH] [Entered: 02/10/2026 08:46 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
Docketing Statement for the Appellees Netflix, Inc., Dennis Liu, Jason Piperberg, Michael B. Jordan, Charles D. King, Carol Barbee, Kim Roth, Poppy Hanks, Kenny Goodman, Outlier Society LLC and Macro Media LLC. Service: 01/28/2026 by email. [1143724] [26-1343] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 01/28/2026 09:06 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
Certificate of Interest for Appellees Netflix, Inc., Dennis Liu, Jason Piperberg, Michael B. Jordan, Charles D. King, Carol Barbee, Kim Roth, Poppy Hanks, Macro Media LLC, Kenny Goodman and Outlier Society LLC. Service: 01/28/2026 by email. [1143723] [26-1343] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 01/28/2026 08:53 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
Entry of Appearance for Jonathan Weinberg as counsel for Appellees Netflix, Inc., Dennis Liu, Michael B. Jordan, Jason Piperberg, Charles D. King, Carol Barbee, Kim Roth, Poppy Hanks, Kenny Goodman, Outlier Society LLC and Macro Media LLC. Service: 01/28/2026 by email. [1143722] [26-1343] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 01/28/2026 08:46 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION of Appellant Renzie Wilson Price for leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis. Service: 01/14/2026 by clerk. [1140606] [IMH] [Entered: 01/14/2026 12:56 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
Appeal docketed. Received: 01/13/2026. [1140603] Entry of Appearance is due on 01/28/2026. Appellant's brief is due on 03/16/2026. [IMH] [Entered: 01/14/2026 12:50 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
