Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
| ARASHI VISION (U.S.) LLC, dba Insta360 |
| GOPRO, INC. |
| 26-1392 |
| January 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC. Service: 07/21/2026 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [1180841] [26-1392] [Seth Lloyd] [Entered: 07/21/2026 08:48 PM] |
| Filing 22 Entry of Appearance for Karl Mihm as counsel for Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC. Service: 07/21/2026 by email. [1180840] [26-1392] [Karl Mihm] [Entered: 07/21/2026 08:43 PM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION of Appellee GoPro, Inc. to extend the time to 10/30/2026 to file brief. Service: 07/17/2026 by email. [1180123] [26-1392] [Adam Steinmetz] [Entered: 07/17/2026 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 20 Note to File: The following cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel: 26-1391, 26-1392, -1393, -1428, 26-1859, -1890. [1173142] [26-1391, 26-1392, 26-1393, 26-1428, 26-1859, 26-1890] [MMA] [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 19 Corrected Entry of Appearance for Betty Chen; Adam Steinmetz; John Desmarais; Karim Oussayef; Leslie Spencer; Rebecca Lindhorst; James M. Glass; Patrick T. Schmidt; Quincy Lu; Joseph Milowic III; Nima Hefazi; Nathan Hamstra; John T. McKee as counsel for Appellee GoPro, Inc.. Service: 05/27/2026 by email. [1169846] [26-1392] [James Glass] [Entered: 05/27/2026 05:33 PM] |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee GoPro, Inc., Amended Entry of Appearance [ # 17 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 05/29/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1168868] [MMA] [Entered: 05/21/2026 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 17 Amended Entry of Appearance for Betty Chen; Adam Steinmetz; John Desmarais; Karim Oussayef; Leslie Spencer; Rebecca Lindhorst as counsel for Appellee GoPro, Inc.. Service: 05/20/2026 by email. [1168388] [26-1392] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 18 ] [James Glass] [Entered: 05/20/2026 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 16 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 15 ] filed by Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC. No further extensions should be anticipated. The opening brief is due 07/21/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1166775] [MMA] [Entered: 05/13/2026 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION of Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC to extend the time to 07/21/2026 to file brief. Service: 05/11/2026 by email. [1166200] [26-1392] [Seth Lloyd] [Entered: 05/11/2026 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 14 Certified list received. Service: 03/23/2026 by email. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [1155076] [26-1392, 26-1393, 26-1428] [MMA] [Entered: 03/24/2026 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 13 Amended Docketing Statement for the Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC. Service: 02/25/2026 by email. [1149517] [26-1392] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 02/25/2026 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 12 Note to File: The following cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel: 26-1391, -1430, 26-1392, -1393, -1428. [1149139] [26-1392, 26-1393, 26-1428] [MMA] [Entered: 02/24/2026 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 11 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 26-1392 (Lead) with 26-1428 and 26-1428 (Member Cases). The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [1149131] [26-1392, 26-1393, 26-1428] [MMA] [Entered: 02/24/2026 11:38 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER consolidating appeals (26-1392, 26-1393, and 26-1428). The revised official caption is reflected in this Order. The Certified Lists are due no later than 03/23/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1149129] [26-1392, 26-1393, 26-1428] [MMA] [Entered: 02/24/2026 11:36 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellee GoPro, Inc.. Service: 02/11/2026 by email. [1146802] [26-1392] [James Glass] [Entered: 02/11/2026 07:09 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellee GoPro, Inc.. Service: 02/11/2026 by email. [1146801] [26-1392] [James Glass] [Entered: 02/11/2026 07:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee GoPro, Inc.. Service: 02/11/2026 by email. [1146800] [26-1392] [James Glass] [Entered: 02/11/2026 07:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 Entry of Appearance for James M. Glass; Patrick T. Schmidt; Quincy Lu; Joseph Milowic III; Nima Hefazi; Nathan Hamstra; John T. McKee as counsel for Appellee GoPro, Inc.. Service: 02/11/2026 by email. [1146799] [26-1392] [James Glass] [Entered: 02/11/2026 07:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC. Service: 02/11/2026 by email. [1146665] [26-1392] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 02/11/2026 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC. Service: 02/11/2026 by email. [1146663] [26-1392] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 02/11/2026 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC. Service: 02/11/2026 by email. [1146660] [26-1392] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 02/11/2026 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Brian R. Matsui; Seth W. Lloyd; Cassandra J. Lincoln; Alex S. Yap; Lily Li as counsel for Appellant Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC. Service: 02/11/2026 by email. [1146658] [26-1392] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 02/11/2026 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 01/23/2026. [1143684] Entry of Appearance due 02/11/2026. Certificate of Interest is due on 02/11/2026. Docketing Statement due 02/11/2026. Certified List due on 03/09/2026. [MMA] [Entered: 01/28/2026 04:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.