Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLCIn re: Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC
| In re: LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC |
| SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC. and SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC |
| 26-142 |
| May 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION of Respondent Seagate Technology (US) Holdings Inc. and Seagate Technology, LLC to extend time. Service: 05/20/2026 by email. [1168537] [26-142] [David Gross] [Entered: 05/20/2026 08:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 Entry of Appearance for David J.F. Gross; Chad Drown, Christopher J. Burrell, Evan Kline-Wedeen as counsel for Respondent Seagate Technology (US) Holdings Inc. and Seagate Technology, LLC. Service: 05/20/2026 by email. [1168536] [26-142] [David Gross] [Entered: 05/20/2026 08:11 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER filed directing Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. and Seagate Technology, LLC to respond no later than seven days from the date of entry of this order. Any reply is due no later than three days thereafter. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1168292] [LMS] [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:50 AM]
|
| Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioner Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 05/18/2026 by US mail, email. [1167976] [IMH] [Entered: 05/19/2026 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 05/18/2026. [1167959] Entry of Appearance is due on 06/02/2026. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/02/2026. [IMH] [Entered: 05/19/2026 10:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
