Valjakka v. Netflix, Inc.
| LAURI VALJAKKA |
| NETFLIX, INC. |
| GOOGLE LLC, AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RPX CORPORATION, WHITESTONE LAW and AIPI, LLC |
| RAMEY LLP and WILLIAM PETERSON RAMEY, III |
| 26-1579 |
| March 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 26-1571 Lead with 26-1579 and 26-1667 Cross-Appeal. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [1164360] [26-1571, 26-1579, 26-1667] [IMH] [Entered: 05/04/2026 12:46 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER consolidating appeals (26-1571, 26-1579, 26-1667). The principal brief of Appellant Lauri Valjakka, addressing Appeal No. 26-1571, remains due no later than 05/26/2026. See order for further details. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1164358] [26-1571, 26-1579, 26-1667] [IMH] [Entered: 05/04/2026 12:43 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 26-1571 Lead with 26-1579 Cross-Appeal. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [1158924] [26-1571, 26-1579] [IMH] [Entered: 04/10/2026 01:57 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER consolidating appeals (26-1571, -1579). Appellant's brief due no later than 05/26/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1158923] [26-1571, 26-1579] [IMH] [Entered: 04/10/2026 01:54 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 03/25/2026. [1155893] Entry of Appearance is due on 04/10/2026. Appellant's brief is due on 05/26/2026. [IMH] [Entered: 03/27/2026 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
