Sparks v. US
| DANIEL B. SPARKS |
| UNITED STATES |
| 26-1765 |
| May 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Military Pay - Retirement |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The paper copies (Doc. No. [17]) provided by Daniel B. Sparks are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Corrected paper copies are due within 5 business days. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1203578] [CDL] [Entered: 10/29/2026 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 17 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 6 ], [ # 13 ], [ # 14 ] received from Appellant Daniel B. Sparks. [1203159] Paper copies of the opening brief are non-compliant. See Doc. No. [ # 18 ] [CDL] [Entered: 10/28/2026 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 16 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 12 ] received from Appellee US. (Night Box). [1202210] [CDL] [Entered: 10/23/2026 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 15 Outstanding paper copies of all briefs and appendices must be submitted within five business days from the date of issuance of this notice. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(3)(A). [1201122] [IMH] [Entered: 10/19/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 14 MODIFIED ENTRY: APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Daniel B. Sparks. Service: 10/13/2026 by email. [1199793] --[Edited 10/19/2026 by IMH - Reason: compliance review complete] [Wojciech Kornacki] [Entered: 10/13/2026 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 13 MODIFIED ENTRY: REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Daniel B. Sparks. Service: 10/06/2026 by email, US mail. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [1198530] --[Edited 10/14/2026 by REL - Reason: compliance review complete] [Wojciech Kornacki] [Entered: 10/06/2026 10:57 PM] |
| Filing 12 MODIFIED ENTRY: RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Appellee US. Service: 09/16/2026 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [1194041] --[Edited 09/23/2026 by IMH - Reason: compliance review complete] [William Rayel] [Entered: 09/16/2026 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 11 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 10 ] filed by Appellee US. The response brief is due 09/16/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1185352] [IMH] [Entered: 08/11/2026 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION of Appellee US to extend the time to 09/16/2026 to file brief. Service: 08/07/2026 by email. [1184881] [26-1765] [William Rayel] [Entered: 08/07/2026 07:50 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice from Appellee US Withdrawal of Lieutenant Carlos A. Pagan. Service: 07/20/2026 by email. [1180232] [26-1765] [William Rayel] [Entered: 07/20/2026 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 8 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Daniel B. Sparks. Service: 07/15/2026 by email. [1179387] --[Edited 07/22/2026 by IMH - Reason: compliance review complete] [Wojciech Kornacki] [Entered: 07/15/2026 12:17 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Daniel B. Sparks, Opening Brief [ # 6 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 07/16/2026. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1178613] [IMH] [Entered: 07/09/2026 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Service: 07/05/2026 by email. [1177467] [26-1765] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 7 ] [Wojciech Kornacki] [Entered: 07/05/2026 08:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of Appearance for William P. Rayel; Lieutenant Carlos A. Pagan as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 05/15/2026 by email. [1167379] [26-1765] [William Rayel] [Entered: 05/15/2026 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Daniel B. Sparks. Service: 05/11/2026 by email. [1166182] [26-1765] [Wojciech Kornacki] [Entered: 05/11/2026 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Daniel B. Sparks. Service: 05/11/2026 by email. [1166170] [26-1765] [Wojciech Kornacki] [Entered: 05/11/2026 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Wojciech Z. Kornacki as counsel for Appellant Daniel B. Sparks. Service: 05/11/2026 by email. [1166151] [26-1765] [Wojciech Kornacki] [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 04/29/2026. [1164449] Entry of Appearance is due on 05/18/2026. Certificate of Interest is due on 05/18/2026. Docketing Statement is due on 05/18/2026. Appellant's brief is due on 07/06/2026.--[Edited 05/04/2026 by IMH to upload sealed opinion] [IMH] [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sparks v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DANIEL B. SPARKS | |
| Represented By: | Wojciech Kornacki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Brett Shumate |
| Represented By: | Douglas K. Mickle |
| Represented By: | Patricia M. McCarthy |
| Represented By: | William James Grimaldi |
| Represented By: | William Porter Rayel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
