Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff: CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant: DYNAMIC MESH NETWORKS, INC., dba MeshDynamics and FRANCIS DACOSTA
Case Number: 26-1796
Filed: May 7, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION of Appellant Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc. to extend the time to 08/20/2026 to file brief. Service: 06/25/2026 by email. [1175908] [26-1796] [Scott Samay] [Entered: 06/25/2026 02:28 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellants Francis daCosta and Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc.. Service: 05/21/2026 by clerk. [1168923] [26-1796] [Scott Samay] [Entered: 05/21/2026 09:24 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Appellants Francis daCosta and Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc.. Service: 05/21/2026 by clerk. [1168922] [26-1796] [Scott Samay] [Entered: 05/21/2026 09:19 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 4 Entry of Appearance for Scott Samay; Jason Charkow; Lisa Phillips; Elizabeth Bernard; Peter Perkowski as counsel for Appellants Francis daCosta and Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc.. Service: 05/21/2026 by clerk. [1168921] [26-1796] [Scott Samay] [Entered: 05/21/2026 09:18 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Cisco Systems, Inc.. Service: 05/21/2026 by email. [1168661] [26-1796] [Elizabeth Moulton] [Entered: 05/21/2026 12:09 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Elizabeth R. Moulton; Lauren A. Weber; Leigh Kramer; Tamir Packin; Lindsey E. Miller as counsel for Appellee Cisco Systems, Inc.. Service: 05/21/2026 by email. [1168660] [26-1796] [Elizabeth Moulton] [Entered: 05/21/2026 12:08 PM]
May 7, 2026 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/01/2026. [1165588] Entry of Appearance due 05/21/2026. Certificate of Interest is due on 05/21/2026. Docketing Statement due 05/21/2026. Appellant's brief is due 07/06/2026. [GWK] [Entered: 05/07/2026 02:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Represented By: Lauren Weber
Represented By: Tamir Packin
Represented By: Lindsey Miller
Represented By: Leigh Kramer
Represented By: Elizabeth Moulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DYNAMIC MESH NETWORKS, INC., dba MeshDynamics
Represented By: Peter E. Perkowski
Represented By: Lisa Noelle Phillips
Represented By: Jason Scott Charkow
Represented By: Elizabeth Bernard
Represented By: Scott R. Samay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANCIS DACOSTA
Represented By: Peter E. Perkowski
Represented By: Lisa Noelle Phillips
Represented By: Jason Scott Charkow
Represented By: Elizabeth Bernard
Represented By: Scott R. Samay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?