Percept Technologies Inc. v. Magic Leap, Inc.
| PERCEPT TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
| MAGIC LEAP, INC. |
| 26-1835 |
| May 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice from Appellee Magic Leap, Inc. of non-participation. Service: 06/30/2026 by email. [1176847] [26-1835] [Alex Yap] [Entered: 06/30/2026 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 10 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellee Magic Leap, Inc.. Service: 06/30/2026 by email. [1176840] [26-1835] [Alex Yap] [Entered: 06/30/2026 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Magic Leap, Inc.. Service: 06/30/2026 by email. [1176839] [26-1835] [Alex Yap] [Entered: 06/30/2026 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 8 Entry of Appearance for Alex S. Yap as counsel for Appellee Magic Leap, Inc.. Service: 06/30/2026 by email. [1176836] [26-1835] [Alex Yap] [Entered: 06/30/2026 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certified list received. Service: 06/29/2026 by email. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [1176810] [MMA] [Entered: 06/30/2026 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice to Appellee Magic Leap, Inc.: The record of this case indicates that no Entry of Appearance under FCR 47.3(b) and Certificate of Interest under FCR 47.4 has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1171250] [GWK] [Entered: 06/03/2026 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Percept Technologies Inc.. Service: 06/01/2026 by email. [1170638] [26-1835] [William Flachsbart] [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant Percept Technologies Inc.. Service: 06/01/2026 by email. [1170637] [26-1835] [William Flachsbart] [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Percept Technologies Inc.. Service: 06/01/2026 by email. [1170636] [26-1835] [William Flachsbart] [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for William W. Flachsbart; Mark A. Magas; Robert P. Greenspoon as counsel for Appellant Percept Technologies Inc.. Service: 06/01/2026 by email. [1170634] [26-1835] [William Flachsbart] [Entered: 06/01/2026 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/12/2026. [1167618] Entry of Appearance due 06/01/2026. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/01/2026. Docketing Statement due 06/01/2026. Certified List due on 06/29/2026. [GWK] [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Percept Technologies Inc. v. Magic Leap, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: PERCEPT TECHNOLOGIES INC. | |
| Represented By: | Mark Magas |
| Represented By: | Robert Greenspoon |
| Represented By: | William W. Flachsbart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: MAGIC LEAP, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Alex S. Yap |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
