Collision Communications, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
| COLLISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. |
| 26-1893 |
| June 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Any opposition to the motion to expedite [ # 3 ] is due no later than seven days from the date of entry of this order. Any reply in support is due no later than three days thereafter. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1171453] [NL] [Entered: 06/03/2026 04:08 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Entry of Appearance for John Bash; Arian Koochesfahani; Sean Pak; Victoria F. Maroulis; Kevin Hardy; John McKee as counsel for Appellees Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Service: 06/03/2026 by email. [1171407] [26-1893] [John Bash] [Entered: 06/03/2026 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION of Appellant Collision Communications, Inc. to expedite.. Service: 06/03/2026 by email. [1171317] [26-1893] [Paul Clement] [Entered: 06/03/2026 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Paul D. Clement; C. Harker Rhodes IV as counsel for Appellant Collision Communications, Inc.. Service: 06/03/2026 by email. [1171312] [26-1893] [Paul Clement] [Entered: 06/03/2026 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/28/2026. [1171102] Entry of Appearance due 06/16/2026. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/16/2026. Docketing Statement due 06/16/2026. Appellant's brief is due 08/03/2026. [MMA] [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
