Ford v. US
| ANTOINE FORD |
| UNITED STATES |
| 26-1915 |
| June 8, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Military Pay - Back Pay |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Brendan Jordan as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 06/08/2026 by email, US mail. [1172545] [26-1915] [Brendan Jordan] [Entered: 06/08/2026 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/02/2026. [1172422] Entry of Appearance due 06/22/2026. Appellant's brief is due 08/07/2026. [GWK] [Entered: 06/08/2026 01:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ford v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANTOINE FORD | |
| Represented By: | Antoine Ford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Brendan David Jordan |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
