Chowdhury v. Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh
| ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY |
| GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH, SHOHAGH PARIBAHAN PRIVATE LTD., GOLAM RABBANI, FARUQUE TALUKDER, NASIR UDDIN and HAFIZUR RAHMAN |
| 26-1937 |
| June 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Stockholders' Suits (Diversity) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Enamul Haqe Chowdhury. Service: 07/09/2026 by clerk. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [1178494] [IMH] [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and Consent to Paper Filing and Electronic Service for Appellant Enamul Haqe Chowdhury. Service: 07/09/2026 by clerk. [1178493] [IMH] [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION of Appellant Enamul Haqe Chowdhury for leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis. Service: 07/09/2026 by clerk. [1178492] [IMH] [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:19 AM] |
Filing 2
ORDER filed; Within 30 days from the date of entry of this order, Mr. Chowdhury is directed to address this court's jurisdiction including whether his appeal should be dismissed or transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Otherwise, these proceedings are stayed. (see order for further details) (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1177580] [NL] [Entered: 07/06/2026 11:28 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/09/2026. [1173447] Fee/IFP is due on 06/26/2026. Entry of Appearance is due on 06/26/2026. Appellant's brief is due on 08/11/2026. [IMH] [Entered: 06/12/2026 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
