Kastens v. IRS
| JOSEPH KASTENS |
| INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
| 26-1952 |
| June 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Clerk's letter to the arbitrator directing that the certified list be filed. Certified List due on 07/28/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1174673] [GWK] [Entered: 06/18/2026 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/12/2026. 15(c) due on 07/02/2026. Entry of Appearance due 07/02/2026. Certificate of Interest is due on 07/02/2026. Docketing Statement due 07/02/2026. [1174669] [GWK] [Entered: 06/18/2026 12:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kastens v. IRS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSEPH KASTENS | |
| Represented By: | Thaxton Blaise Springfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
