Brady v. US
| FAITH SHAYIA BRADY |
| UNITED STATES |
| 26-2274 |
| September 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for David M. Kerr as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 09/17/2026 by US mail, email. [1194301] [26-2274] [David Kerr] [Entered: 09/17/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/14/2026. [1194252] Entry of Appearance due 10/01/2026. Appellants brief is due 11/16/2026. [MMA] [Entered: 09/17/2026 01:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Brady v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FAITH SHAYIA BRADY | |
| Represented By: | Faith Shayia Brady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | David Michael Kerr |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.