OCTAL Inc. et al v. United States
Plaintiff: OCTAL Inc. and OCTAL SAOC-FZC
Defendant: United States
Not Yet Classified: APG Polytech, LLC, DAK Americas LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc. and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America
Case Number: 1:2022cv00135
Filed: May 2, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of International Trade
Presiding Judge: Claire R Kelly
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2022 Filing 17 Public Administrative Record Index for USITC filed . Filed by Andrea C. Casson of U.S. International Trade Commission on behalf of United States. (Attachments: #1 USITC Pub 5298)(Casson, Andrea)
June 13, 2022 Filing 16 Confidential Administrative Record Index for USITC filed . Filed by Andrea C. Casson of U.S. International Trade Commission on behalf of United States. (Attachments: #1 Confidential Commission Views, #2 Confidential Staff Report)(Casson, Andrea)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order entered on 6/1/2022, granting consent Motion to intervene. ORDERED that APG Polytech, LLC, DAK Americas, LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America shall be designated as Defendant-Intervenors in this action. (Related Doc #11 ) (Taronji, Steve)
June 1, 2022 Filing 14 Form 17 Business Proprietary Information Certification filed on behalf of Brooke M. Ringel, Paul C. Rosenthal, Kathleen W. Cannon, Elizabeth C. Johnson, Bradley Hudgens, Gina E. Beck as Attorney/Consultant(s) for defendant-intervenors APG Polytech, LLC, DAK Americas LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America. Filed by Brooke Michelle Ringel of Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP on behalf of APG Polytech, LLC, DAK Americas LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America. (Ringel, Brooke)
June 1, 2022 Filing 13 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Brooke Michelle Ringel of Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP on behalf of APG Polytech, LLC, DAK Americas LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America. (Ringel, Brooke)
June 1, 2022 Filing 12 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Brooke Michelle Ringel of Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP on behalf of APG Polytech, LLC, DAK Americas LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America.(Ringel, Brooke)
June 1, 2022 Filing 11 Consent Motion to Intervene as Defendant-Intervenor . Responses due by 6/22/2022. Filed by Brooke Michelle Ringel of Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP on behalf of APG Polytech, LLC, DAK Americas LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ringel, Brooke)
May 25, 2022 Filing 10 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Andrea C. Casson of U.S. International Trade Commission on behalf of United States.(Casson, Andrea)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order entered on 5/19/2022, assigning action to Judge Claire R. Kelly. (Taronji, Steve)
May 3, 2022 Filing 8 Summons served by Clerk's Office upon Plaintiff and appropriate Government Agency/Agencies . (Benbow, Troy)
May 2, 2022 Filing 7 Certificate of service (related document(s) #5 , #2 , #6 , #1 , #4 , #3 ). Filed by Daniel Lewis Porter of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP on behalf of OCTAL Inc., OCTAL SAOC-FZC. (Porter, Daniel)
May 2, 2022 Filing 6 Form 11 Notice of Appearance Daniel L. Porter, James P. Durling, James C. Beaty, Ana M. Amador Gil. Filed by Daniel Lewis Porter of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP on behalf of OCTAL Inc., OCTAL SAOC-FZC.(Porter, Daniel)
May 2, 2022 Filing 5 Form 17 Business Proprietary Information Certification filed on behalf of Daniel L. Porter; James P. Durling; James C. Beaty; Ana M. Amador Gil as Attorney/Consultant(s) . Filed by Daniel Lewis Porter of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP on behalf of OCTAL Inc., OCTAL SAOC-FZC. (Porter, Daniel)
May 2, 2022 Filing 4 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Daniel Lewis Porter of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP on behalf of OCTAL Inc., OCTAL SAOC-FZC. (Porter, Daniel)
May 2, 2022 Filing 3 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Daniel Lewis Porter of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP on behalf of OCTAL Inc., OCTAL SAOC-FZC. (Porter, Daniel)
May 2, 2022 Filing 2 Public Complaint against United States. Administrative Record due by 6/13/2022. Filed by Daniel Lewis Porter of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP on behalf of OCTAL Inc., OCTAL SAOC-FZC.(Porter, Daniel)
May 2, 2022 Filing 1 Summons . Filed by Daniel Lewis Porter of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP on behalf of OCTAL Inc., OCTAL SAOC-FZC. (Porter, Daniel)

Search for this case: OCTAL Inc. et al v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OCTAL Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Lewis Porter
Represented By: Ana Maria Amador - Gil
Represented By: James Corscaden Beaty
Represented By: James Philip Durling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OCTAL SAOC-FZC
Represented By: Daniel Lewis Porter
Represented By: Ana Maria Amador - Gil
Represented By: James Corscaden Beaty
Represented By: James Philip Durling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Represented By: Andrea C. Casson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: APG Polytech, LLC
Represented By: Brooke Michelle Ringel
Represented By: Elizabeth C. Johnson
Represented By: Kathleen Weaver Cannon
Represented By: Paul Charles Rosenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: DAK Americas LLC
Represented By: Brooke Michelle Ringel
Represented By: Elizabeth C. Johnson
Represented By: Kathleen Weaver Cannon
Represented By: Paul Charles Rosenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: Indorama Ventures USA, Inc.
Represented By: Brooke Michelle Ringel
Represented By: Elizabeth C. Johnson
Represented By: Kathleen Weaver Cannon
Represented By: Paul Charles Rosenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America
Represented By: Brooke Michelle Ringel
Represented By: Elizabeth C. Johnson
Represented By: Kathleen Weaver Cannon
Represented By: Paul Charles Rosenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?