United States v. Siboney Corporation
| United States |
| Siboney Corporation |
| 1:2022cv00204 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of International Trade |
| M Miller Baker |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order entered on 9/1/2022 PAPERLESS ORDER: Plaintiffs consent motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint (ECF 10, original; ECF 11, corrected) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint no later than October 17, 2022. (Related Doc #11 , #10 ). (Cheevers, Casey)
|
| Filing 11 (Corrected) Second Motion for extension of time until 10/17/2022 to respond complaint . Responses due by 9/20/2022. Filed by Peter Alan Quinter of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. on behalf of Siboney Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Amended)(Quinter, Peter) Modified on 8/30/2022 (Cheevers, Casey). |
| Filing 10 Second Motion for extension of time until 10/17/2022 to respond complaint . Responses due by 9/20/2022. Filed by Peter Alan Quinter of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. on behalf of Siboney Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Quinter, Peter) |
|
Filing 9
Order respecting document formatting entered on 8/18/2022. ORDERED that all future filings on this docket shall comply with the requirements applicable to these chambers set forth on the Court's website. The court will grant reasonable requests for extension of time as a matter of course provided the motion establishes the other parties' consent to the relief sought. Such consent motions need not explain the reasons for requesting the extension.(Cheevers, Casey) Modified on 8/18/2022 (Cheevers, Casey).
|
|
Filing 8
Order entered on 8/17/2022 assigning action to Judge M. Miller Baker.(Cheevers, Casey)
|
| Filing 7 Affidavit/declarations of service of summons and complaint. Filed by Beverly A. Farrell of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States. (Farrell, Beverly) |
|
Filing 6
Order entered on 8/1/2022 granting Motion for extension of time to file answer to complaint (Related Doc #5 ). Answer due by 9/2/2022. (Benbow, Troy)
|
| Filing 5 Consent Motion for extension of time until 9/2/2022 to respond complaint . Responses due by 8/22/2022. Filed by Peter Alan Quinter of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. on behalf of Siboney Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Quinter, Peter) |
| Filing 4 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Peter Alan Quinter of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. on behalf of Siboney Corporation.(Quinter, Peter) |
| Filing 3 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Beverly A. Farrell of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States. (Farrell, Beverly) |
| Filing 2 Complaint against Siboney Corporation. Filed by Beverly A. Farrell of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States.(Farrell, Beverly) |
| Filing 1 Summons . Filed by Beverly A. Farrell of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States. (Farrell, Beverly) |
| Search for this case: United States v. Siboney Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States | |
| Represented By: | Beverly A. Farrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Siboney Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Peter Alan Quinter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
