United States v. Liu et al
United States |
Zhe "John" Liu and GL Paper Distribution, LLC |
1:2022cv00215 |
July 21, 2022 |
U.S. Court of International Trade |
Jane A Restani |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Response to motion to strike (related document(s) #6 ). Filed by William George Kanellis of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kanellis, William) |
Filing 8 Order entered on 9/1/2022 assigning action to Judge Jane A. Restani. (Goell, Geoffrey) |
Filing 7 Answer to Complaint . Filed by David John Craven of Craven Trade Law LLC on behalf of Zhe "John" Liu. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Craven, David) |
Filing 6 Motion to strike portions of complaint (related document(s) #2 ). Responses due by 9/8/2022. Filed by David John Craven of Craven Trade Law LLC on behalf of Zhe "John" Liu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Craven, David) |
Filing 5 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by David John Craven of Craven Trade Law LLC on behalf of Zhe "John" Liu. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Craven, David) |
Filing 4 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by David John Craven of Craven Trade Law LLC on behalf of Zhe "John" Liu. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Craven, David) |
Filing 3 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by William George Kanellis of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States. (Kanellis, William) |
Filing 2 Complaint against All Defendants. Filed by William George Kanellis of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kanellis, William) |
Filing 1 Summons . Filed by William George Kanellis of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States. (Kanellis, William) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.