Magnum Magnetics Corporation v. United States
| Magnum Magnetics Corporation |
| United States |
| Fasteners for Retail, Inc. doing business as Siffron |
| 1:2022cv00254 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of International Trade |
| Jennifer Choe-Groves |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
Order entered on 10/26/2022, granting Unopposed Motion to intervene as Defendant-Intervenor. ORDERED that Fasteners for Retail, Inc. be entered as Defendant-Intervenor in the above-captioned action. (Related Doc #14 ). (Goell, Geoffrey)
|
| Filing 17 Form 17 Business Proprietary Information Certification filed on behalf of Kristen Smith, Sarah E. Yuskaitis as Attorney/Consultant(s) . Filed by Sarah Elizabeth Yuskaitis of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, PA on behalf of Fasteners for Retail, Inc.. (Yuskaitis, Sarah) |
| Filing 16 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Sarah Elizabeth Yuskaitis of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, PA on behalf of Fasteners for Retail, Inc.. (Yuskaitis, Sarah) |
| Filing 15 Form 11 Notice of Appearance of Kristen Smith and Sarah E. Yuskaitis. Filed by Sarah Elizabeth Yuskaitis of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, PA on behalf of Fasteners for Retail, Inc..(Yuskaitis, Sarah) |
| Filing 14 Unopposed Motion to Intervene as Defendant-Intervenor as a matter of right. Responses due by 11/16/2022. Filed by Sarah Elizabeth Yuskaitis of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, PA on behalf of Fasteners for Retail, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Yuskaitis, Sarah) |
| Filing 13 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Ian Andrew McInerney of U.S. Department of Commerce on behalf of United States.(McInerney, Ian) |
| Filing 12 Rule 56.2 Notice. the Parties shall confer and file, by no later than November 7, 2022, a joint status report and an agreed upon proposed briefing schedule. (Taronji, Steve) |
|
Filing 11
Order entered on 10/6/2022, assigning action to Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves. (Taronji, Steve)
|
| Filing 10 Form 17 Business Proprietary Information Certification filed on behalf of Jeremy W. Dutra as Attorney/Consultant(s) . Filed by Jeremy William Dutra of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP on behalf of Magnum Magnetics Corporation. (Dutra, Jeremy) |
| Filing 9 Complaint against United States. Administrative Record due by 11/7/2022. Filed by Jeremy William Dutra of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP on behalf of Magnum Magnetics Corporation.(Dutra, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 Amended Summons deemed filed. Filed by Jeremy William Dutra of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP on behalf of Magnum Magnetics Corporation. (Benbow, Troy) |
| Filing 7 Summons served by Clerk's Office upon Plaintiff and appropriate Government Agency/Agencies . (Benbow, Troy) |
|
Filing 6
Order entered on 9/15/2022 granting Motion for errata (Related Doc #4 ). (Benbow, Troy)
|
| Filing 5 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Daniel Francis Roland of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States.(Roland, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 Motion for errata to correct Summons. Filed with the Court electronically on 9/8/2022 as document number 1 (related document(s) #1 ). Responses due by 9/30/2022. Filed by Jeremy William Dutra of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP on behalf of Magnum Magnetics Corporation.(Dutra, Jeremy) |
| Filing 3 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Jeremy William Dutra of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP on behalf of Magnum Magnetics Corporation. (Dutra, Jeremy) |
| Filing 2 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Jeremy William Dutra of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP on behalf of Magnum Magnetics Corporation. (Dutra, Jeremy) |
| Filing 1 [***NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED BY DOC # 8 AMENDED SUMMONS***] Summons . Filed by Jeremy William Dutra of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP on behalf of Magnum Magnetics Corporation. (Dutra, Jeremy) Modified on 9/15/2022 (Benbow, Troy). |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
