Nippon Steel Corporation v. United States
Nippon Steel Corporation |
United States Department of Commerce and United States |
Nucor Corporation |
1:2023cv00112 |
June 5, 2023 |
U.S. Court of International Trade |
Stephen Alexander Vaden |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Order entered on 7/27/2023 granting Consent Motion to Intervene. On consideration of the Consent Motion to Intervene filed by Nucor Corporation ("Nucor") and on consideration of all other papers and proceedings herein, it is hereby: ORDERED that the Motion is granted as of right per 28 U.S.C. 2631(j)(1)(B); and ORDERED that Nucor is party to this action as Defendant-Intervenor. SO ORDERED. (Related Doc #16 ) (Chien, Jason) |
Filing 19 Form 17 Business Proprietary Information Certification filed on behalf of Alan H. Price, Christopher B. Weld, Maureen E. Thorson, Jeffrey O. Frank, Enbar Toledano, Theodore P. Brackemyre, John Allen Riggins as Attorney/Consultant(s) . Filed by Alan Hayden Price of Wiley Rein, LLP on behalf of Nucor Corporation. (Price, Alan) |
Filing 18 Form 11 Notice of Appearance on behalf of Alan H. Price, Christopher B. Weld, Maureen E. Thorson, Jeffrey O. Frank, Enbar Toledano, Theodore P. Brackemyre, John Allen Riggins. Filed by Alan Hayden Price of Wiley Rein, LLP on behalf of Nucor Corporation.(Price, Alan) |
Filing 17 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement on behalf of Nucor Corporation. Filed by Alan Hayden Price of Wiley Rein, LLP on behalf of Nucor Corporation. (Price, Alan) |
Filing 16 Consent Motion to Intervene as Defendant-Intervenor on behalf of Nucor Corporation. Responses due by 8/17/2023. Filed by Alan Hayden Price of Wiley Rein, LLP on behalf of Nucor Corporation.(Price, Alan) |
Filing 15 Administrative Record Index for U.S. Department of Commerce filed . Filed by David W. Richardson of U.S. Department of Commerce on behalf of United States. (Attachments: #1 Public Index, #2 BPI Index, #3 Record Declaration, #4 IDM, #5 Final FR)(Richardson, David) |
Filing 14 Scheduling Order entered on 7/18/2023: On consideration of the status conference held on July 18, 2023, and in accordance with USCIT Rule 42(a)(1), it is hereby: ORDERED that Court Nos. 21-533, 22-183, and 23-112 are joined for hearing and decision; and it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned cases shall adhere to the following briefing schedule: (1) The administrative record for Court No. 23-112 is due as soon as possible; (2) The joint status report for Court No. 23-112 is no longer necessary; (3) Plaintiff shall file its supplemental opening brief on or before September 18, 2023, not to exceed 10,000 words; (4) Defendant shall file its response brief on or before November 17, 2023, not to exceed 10,000 words; (5) Defendant-Intervenors shall file their response briefs on or before December 1, 2023, not to exceed 5,000 words; (6) Plaintiff shall file its reply brief on or before December 22, 2023, not to exceed 5,000 words; (7) Briefs - for all three cases jointly - are to be filed in Case No. 21-533 with the caption reflecting all three joined cases' numbers; (8) Plaintiff shall file a joint appendix on each individual case's docket, as needed, on or before January 5, 2024; (9) Motions for Oral Argument, if any, shall be filed on or before January 12, 2024. (10) The Court takes this schedule seriously and will enforce the good cause standard for any proposed deviations. The parties are reminded to review Judge Vaden's guidelines for preparation of the Joint Appendix found on the Court's website. Pursuant to Rules 1, 7, 16, and 56.2 of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade, the foregoing schedule is hereby made an order of the Court. SO ORDERED. (Chien, Jason) |
Filing 13 Order entered on 7/12/2023 assigning action to Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden. (Chien, Jason) |
Filing 12 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by David W. Richardson of U.S. Department of Commerce on behalf of United States.(Richardson, David) |
Filing 11 Order entered on 6/30/2023, Form 24 Order for Statutory Injunction Upon Consent Granted. (Taronji, Steve) |
Filing 10 Form 24 Proposed Order for Statutory Injunction Upon Consent . Filed by Shawn Michael Higgins of Sidley Austin, LLP on behalf of Nippon Steel Corporation. (Higgins, Shawn) |
Filing 9 Complaint against United States. Administrative Record due by 8/9/2023. Filed by Shawn Michael Higgins of Sidley Austin, LLP on behalf of Nippon Steel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Higgins, Shawn) |
Filing 8 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Kyle S. Beckrich of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States.(Beckrich, Kyle) |
Filing 7 Summons served by Clerk's Office upon Plaintiff and appropriate Government Agency/Agencies . (Chien, Jason) |
Filing 6 Certificate of service to summons and other initiating documentation. Filed by Shawn Michael Higgins of Sidley Austin, LLP on behalf of Nippon Steel Corporation. (Higgins, Shawn) |
Filing 5 Form 17 Business Proprietary Information Certification filed on behalf of Shawn M. Higgins, Rajib Pal, Justin R. Becker, and Lindsey A. Ricchi as Attorney/Consultant(s) . Filed by Shawn Michael Higgins of Sidley Austin, LLP on behalf of Nippon Steel Corporation. (Higgins, Shawn) |
Filing 4 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Shawn Michael Higgins of Sidley Austin, LLP on behalf of Nippon Steel Corporation. (Higgins, Shawn) |
Filing 3 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Shawn Michael Higgins of Sidley Austin, LLP on behalf of Nippon Steel Corporation. (Higgins, Shawn) |
Filing 2 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Shawn Michael Higgins of Sidley Austin, LLP on behalf of Nippon Steel Corporation.(Higgins, Shawn) |
Filing 1 Summons . Filed by Shawn Michael Higgins of Sidley Austin, LLP on behalf of Nippon Steel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Letter Cover Letter, #2 Form 5, #3 Form 13, #4 Form 17, #5 Certificate of Service) (Higgins, Shawn) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.