Unichem Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
| Unichem Enterprises and Unichem Enterprises, Inc. |
| United States |
| 1:2024cv00033 |
| February 6, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of International Trade |
| Timothy M Reif |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order entered on 3/20/2024 denying Motion to Expedite. Upon consideration of plaintiffs Motion to Expedite, ECF No. 8, and defendant's Response thereto, ECF No. 9, the court denies plaintiffs Motion to Expedite. Defendant states in its Response that it intends to file its Answer to the Complaint by the April 8, 2024 deadline. Def.'s Resp. Pl.'s Mot. Exp. at 1, ECF No. 9. Until defendant files an Answer, the court does not deem that it has the necessary facts to decide whether the instant action merits precedence over other actions. USCIT Rule 3(g)(3) states that the court on motion for good cause... may expedite... an action described in 28 U.S.C. 1581(a) to contest the denial of a protest, in whole or in part, under section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, involving the exclusion or redelivery of merchandise USCIT R. 3(g)(3) (emphasis supplied). Aside from stating that the subject merchandise "has an expiration date," plaintiff has not shown or iterated reasons that the court should expedite the instant action. Pl.s Mot. Exp. at 1, ECF No. 8. In the absence of good cause from plaintiff and defendant's opposition to expediting the action, the court denies plaintiffs motion without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Related Doc #8 ). (Hugh, Lewis)
|
| Filing 9 Response by defendant to Motion by plaintiff to expedite (related document(s) #8 ). Filed by Hardeep K. Josan of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States.(Josan, Hardeep) |
| Filing 8 Motion to Expedite . Responses due by 3/13/2024. Filed by Christopher J. Duncan of Stein Shostak Shostak Pollack & O'Hara, LLP on behalf of Unichem Enterprises, Inc..(Duncan, Christopher) |
|
Filing 7
Order entered on 2/15/2024 assigning action to Judge Timothy M. Reif.(Hugh, Lewis)
|
| Filing 6 Form 11 Notice of Appearance Hardeep K. Josan. Filed by Hardeep K. Josan of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States.(Josan, Hardeep) |
| Filing 5 Complaint against United States. Answer due by 4/8/2024. Filed by Christopher J. Duncan of Stein Shostak Shostak Pollack & O'Hara, LLP on behalf of Unichem Enterprises.(Duncan, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Summons served by Clerk's Office upon: Plaintiff, Defendant and U.S. Customs and Border Protection . (Chien, Jason) |
| Filing 3 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Christopher J. Duncan of Stein Shostak Shostak Pollack & O'Hara, LLP on behalf of Unichem Enterprises. (Duncan, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Christopher J. Duncan of Stein Shostak Shostak Pollack & O'Hara, LLP on behalf of Unichem Enterprises. (Duncan, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 Summons . Filed by Christopher J. Duncan of Stein Shostak Shostak Pollack & O'Hara, LLP on behalf of Unichem Enterprises. Protests and entries due by 5/6/2024. (Duncan, Christopher) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
