Innolux Corporation v. United States
| Innolux Corporation |
| United States |
| 1:2024cv00065 |
| March 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of International Trade |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons served by Clerk's Office upon: Plaintiff, Defendant and U.S. Customs and Border Protection . (Chien, Jason) |
| Filing 3 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Erik D. Smithweiss of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Innolux Corporation. (Smithweiss, Erik) |
| Filing 2 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Erik D. Smithweiss of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Innolux Corporation. (Smithweiss, Erik) |
| Filing 1 Summons . Filed by Innolux Corporation Innolux Corporation. Protests and entries due by 6/24/2024. (Smithweiss, Erik) |
| Search for this case: Innolux Corporation v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Innolux Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Erik D. Smithweiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States | |
| Represented By: | Attorney-in-Charge |
| Represented By: | CBP Assistant Chief Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
