Sharp Electronics Corporation v. United States et al
| Sharp Electronics Corporation |
| United States, Commissioner Rodney S. Scott and United States Customs and Border Protection |
| 1:2025cv00901 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of International Trade |
| Other |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Pursuant to Administrative Order 25-02, this case is stayed. See: https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/uscit-rules-forms-chambers-procedures-guidelines-and-administrative-orders.(Warner, Scott) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of service (related document(s) #4 , #5 , #1 , #3 , #2 ). Filed by Andrew Thomas Schutz of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Sharp Electronics Corporation. (Schutz, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Andrew Thomas Schutz of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Sharp Electronics Corporation. (Schutz, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Andrew Thomas Schutz of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Sharp Electronics Corporation.(Schutz, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Andrew Thomas Schutz of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Sharp Electronics Corporation. (Schutz, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Complaint against Rodney S. Scott, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, United States. Answer due by 2/20/2026. Filed by Andrew Thomas Schutz of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Sharp Electronics Corporation.(Schutz, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 Summons . Filed by Andrew Thomas Schutz of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Sharp Electronics Corporation. (Schutz, Andrew) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.