ITI Tropicals, LLC v. United States et al
| ITI Tropicals, LLC |
| United States of America, Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection, Scott Bessent, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury, United States Department of Homeland Security, HOWARD LUTNICK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce, Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection, Office of the United States Trade Representative and Jamieson Greer, in his official capacity as United States Trade Representative |
| 1:2026cv01708 |
| March 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of International Trade |
| Richard K Eaton |
| Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order entered on 7/22/2026; ORDERED that U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall reliquidate, without regard to IEEPA duties, any and all of Plaintiffs entries that have been liquidated for more than 80 days and on which Plaintiffs made estimated deposits pursuant to IEEPA. For the purposes of this order, reliquidation of entries that have been liquidated for more than 80 days is subject to Plaintiffs counsels submission to U.S. Customs and Border Protection of Plaintiffs importer of record identification number(s), in accordance with instructions to be provided by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and conveyed to Plaintiffs counsel. Also, for the purposes of this order, reliquidation shall occur only following U.S. Customs and Border Protections acceptance of Plaintiffs CAPE declarations; it is further ORDERED that, for the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this order addresses issues concerning duty free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321 that are otherwise before this Court. See Axle of Dearborn, Inc. v. Department of Commerce et al., No. 25-00091; and it is further ORDERED that this action remains stayed except to the extent this order directs specific actions by the parties.(Swindell, Stephen)
|
| Filing 11 Paperless Order entered on 7/14/2026: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 253(c) and Rule 77(e) of the Rules of this Court, this matter is hereby assigned to the Honorable Richard K. Eaton. This matter remains stayed pending any action by the assigned judge. (Almonte, Giselle) |
| Filing 10 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Marie Bussey-Garza of DLA Piper US LLP on behalf of All Plaintiffs.(Bussey-Garza, Marie) |
| Filing 9 Pursuant to Administrative Order 25-02, this case is stayed. See: https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/uscit-rules-forms-chambers-procedures-guidelines-and-administrative-orders.(Warner, Scott) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of service (related document(s) #5 , #2 , #7 , #3 , #1 , #4 , #6 ). Filed by Brian Samuel Janovitz of DLA Piper LLP (US) on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Janovitz, Brian) |
| Filing 7 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Elyssa R. Kutner of DLA Piper US LLP on behalf of All Plaintiffs.(Kutner, Elyssa) |
| Filing 6 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Caleb Brice Roche of DLA Piper LLP (US) on behalf of All Plaintiffs.(Roche, Caleb) |
| Filing 5 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Brian Samuel Janovitz of DLA Piper LLP (US) on behalf of All Plaintiffs.(Janovitz, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Complaint against All Defendants. Answer due by 5/11/2026. Filed by Brian Samuel Janovitz of DLA Piper LLP (US) on behalf of All Plaintiffs.(Janovitz, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Brian Samuel Janovitz of DLA Piper LLP (US) on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Janovitz, Brian) |
| Filing 2 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Brian Samuel Janovitz of DLA Piper LLP (US) on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Janovitz, Brian) |
| Filing 1 Summons . Filed by Brian Samuel Janovitz of DLA Piper LLP (US) on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Janovitz, Brian) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
