USA, et al v. CO Organic Chem Co, et al
| USA and Colorado, State of |
| Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company |
| NDSC Industrial Park, LLC |
| 1:1998cv01600 |
| July 23, 1998 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 9613 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER Denying 56 NDSC Industrial Park, LLCs Consent Decree Order Motion, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/29/2016.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Granting 60 the Unopposed Motion to Intervene By Thomas Z. Mars, Denver Rock Island Railroad, and Union Pacific Railroad Company, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/30/2015.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
55
MINUTE ORDER Striking 54 NDSC Industrial Park, LLCs (NDSC) Consent Decree Order Motion. Should NDSC wish to refile a proper Motion, it shall be filed no later than Monday September 21, 2015, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/10/2015.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Granting 38 NDSC Industrial Park, LLCs Partially Unopposed Motion to Intervene to the extent that NDSC is entitled to intervene in this case as a matter of right. It is FURTHER ORDERED that NDSC shall refile its Motion to Enforce Consent Decree Order ECF No. [38-1] as a separate motion not later than Monday, September 14, 2015. Entered by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/19/2015.(evana, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
