Tillotson v. Englewood Police Dep, et al
Case Number: 1:2004cv00552
Filed: March 23, 2004
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 99 Minute ORDER denying 98 (Motion) request to reopen this action, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/15/12.(lygsl, )
August 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 97 Minute ORDER denying 96 request to reopen this action, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/28/12.(lygsl, )
August 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 79 Minute ORDER denying 78 Motion to Reopen Case by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 08/18/10.(jjh, )
July 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 75 Minute ORDER denying 74 Motion to Reopen Case by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 07/14/10.(jjh, )
March 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 Minute ORDER denying 66 Motion to Reopen Case by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 03/10/10.(jjh, )
February 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER To Cure Deficiency re: 53 Notice of Appeal filed by Chris Tillotson by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 02/26/09. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion with the district court.(bjrsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tillotson v. Englewood Police Dep, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?