DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge Tech Inc, et al
Case Number: 1:2004cv01160
Filed: June 7, 2004
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Contract: Other Office
Presiding Judge: Lewis T. Babcock
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 198 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND RELEASE AND DISCHARGE OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND. This case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. The supersedeas bond (no. 104952325) posted by Lionbridge as Principal and The Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America as Surety is hereby fully and unconditionally released, discharged and exonerated. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/30/2009. (sah, )
September 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 195 COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 9/17/2009. ORDERED: A Telephonic Status Conference is set for SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. Counsel shall coordinate a conferen ce call among themselves prior to contacting the court (303.844.2117) at the scheduled time. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion (a) to Compel Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Plai ntiff and (b) for Leave to Take Plaintiff's Deposition (doc # 191 , filed 9/1/2009) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is denied without prejudice to the extent that it seeks leave to take Plaintiff's deposition. The court will HOLD IN ABEYANCE that part of the Motion that seeks to compel the production of documents pending the outcome of the next status conference. The part of the Motion that seeks to compel further responses to interrogatories is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is required to supplement responses to interrogatories #2, #4, and #5 consistent with the court's ruling from the bench. The Motion is denied in all other respects. ORDERED: Pursuant to Rule 37(a), the parties shall each bear their own fees and costs incurred in connection with this motion, the response, and the related hearing, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)
April 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 184 ORDER. Defendant is granted leave, within the next 20 days, to propound five Interrogatories on Plaintiffs damages theory and to submit one request for production seeking Plaintiffs medical records dated subsequent to the trial of this case. Defenda nts requests for leave to endorse an expert witness on the subject of mitigation and/or to endorse Ms. Ross as an expert witness for the re-trial on damages are DENIED. The re-trial on damages is set for five days, commencing on 11/09/2009 at 8:30 a.m. The hours for the trial days will be 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., with a morning recess and a 30-minute noon recess trial preparation conference is set 10/22/2009 at 8:30 a.m. by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 04/28/2009. (sah, )
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 181 MINUTE ORDER granting 180 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reset Scheduling Conference. The scheduling hearing set Wednesday, 04/22/2009 is VACATED and RESET for Monday, 04/27/2009 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom C401 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 04/07/2009.(sah, )
March 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 178 ORDER denying 166 Defendant Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.s Motion to Discharge Supersedeas Bond Number 104952325 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/18/2009.(sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge Tech Inc, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?