Maxwell v. Kerr-McGee Chem Wrld, et al
Case Number: 1:2004cv01224
Filed: June 14, 2004
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 31:3729 False Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 370 ORDER granting 368 Motion to Stay the execution on the Opinion and order re attorney fees, expenses and costs, and approving the Supersedeas Bond filed by Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 07/15/11.(bjrsl, )
June 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 359 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, APPLICATION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES, EXPENSES AND COSTS. Granting in part 340 Relator's Application for Award of Attorney Fees and Expenses and Costs. Court awards Maxwell $2,178,632.25 in attorneys' fees and $109,341.79 in expenses under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(2), by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/2/11.(gmssl, )
October 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 338 ORDER GRANTING 337 STAY OF EXEUCTION AND APPROVAL OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND. Defendant Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corporation's 337 Unopposed Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment and for Approval of Supersedeas Bond is GRANTED. The supersedeas bond pos ted by Defendant Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corporation is hereby approved. All parties are hereby stayed from executing, or attempting to execute, on the 333 Judgment entered in this case and from pursuing any proceedings to enforce the Judgment pending the conclusion of all appellate proceedings, including appellate proceedings to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and other appeals as the law may allow, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/01/2010.(wjc, )
September 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 332 Opinion and ORDER granting in part 313 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment; denying as moot 318 Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/16/10.(gmssl, )
February 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 325 ORDER on Motion to Strike Notice of Attorneys' Lien and for Sanctions, # 298 is DENIED by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/17/2010.(cbscd)
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 320 ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/07/2009. (sah, )
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 309 Minute Entry for Motion Hearing proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/19/09. Taking under advisement, pending State Court action 298 Motion to Strike. (FTR Court Reporter - B. Abiakam)(babia) Modified on 10/26/2009 to remove repetitive text(sah, ).
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 304 ORDER denying 267 Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Alternative Motion for New Trial and Motion for Remittitur. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/30/2009.(sah, )
March 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 280 ORDER of Recusal directing reassignment to another judge by Judge John L. Kane on 03/23/2009. (sah, )
March 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 276 ORDER denying as moot 272 Relator's Request (Motion) for Approval and Entry of Judgment, by Judge John L. Kane on 03/09/09.(wjc, )
February 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 269 ORDER of Recusal directing reassignment to another judge by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 02/18/2009. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxwell v. Kerr-McGee Chem Wrld, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?