Fogle v. Pierson et al
1:2005cv01211 |
June 30, 2005 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Phillip S. Figa |
Craig B Shaffer |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 296 ORDER that plaintiff is not entitled to equitable tolling and dismissing due process claims based on conduct which occurred before June 20, 2003 and OVERRULING as moot 270 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; 273 Motion for Judgment on the Plead ings; 275 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; 276 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and 277 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directing plaintiff to show cause in writing (1) why plaintiff did not receive all proces s which he was due under the three factors identified in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976), and Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 (1983) as discussed in Wilkinson and DiMarco; (2) why defendants should not be entitled to qualified immunity fo r any violation of plaintiffs rights to procedural due process amd (3) why all claims against Hunter on or after June 20, 2003 should not be dismissed. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the parties appear in Courtroom 702 at 4:00p.m. on Wednesday, July 14, 2010, to address the matters raised in this order to show cause. The jury trial of this matter is hereby continued to Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 1:00 p.m.by Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 7/13/2010.(Vratil, Kathryn) |
Filing 295 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kathryn H. Vratil: taking under advisement 276 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Bench Trial completed on 7/12/2010; Amended to correct total time in Court. (Court Reporter Kara Spitler) (gkram) |
Filing 285 ORDER. Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Service of Subpoenas and Payment of Witness Fees at Government Expense Based upon Plaintiffs in Forma Pauperis and Indigent Status 278 is granted. The Court orders that the U.S. Marshal serve all subpoenas prepared by Plaintiff in this matter and that the witness fees and mileage incident thereto be paid by the United States. By Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 06/24/2010. (sah, ) |
Filing 23 ORDER Reinstating and Drawing Case to a District Judge and a Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to the 22 USCA Mandate, this civil action is reinstated. The action to be drawn to a district judge and a magistrate judge. Signed by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 4/3/06. (gms, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fogle v. Pierson et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.