Lobato et al v. Ford et al
| 1:2005cv01437 |
| July 29, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Craig B Shaffer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
301
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the "Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Disqualify... " (filed July 13, 2007) (doc. # 233 ) and the "Reply to Defendant City and County of Denver's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Disqualify..." (filed August 7, 2007) (doc. # 244 ) shall be unsealed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 12/2/2009. (cbscd)
|
|
Filing
297
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that in the absence of any objection filed on or before December 1, 2009, the court will direct the Clerk of the Court to unseal: (1) the "Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Disqualify... " (filed July 13, 2007) (doc. # 233 ); and (2) the "Reply to Defendant City and County of Denver's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Disqualify..." (filed August 7, 2007) (doc. # 244 ) by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/17/2009. (cbscd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lobato et al v. Ford et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
