A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S v. Tingey Trading International, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2005cv01570
Filed: August 15, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
Presiding Judge: Patricia A. Coan
Presiding Judge: Wiley Y. Daniel
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 19 AMENDED ORDER re: 13 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S, 18 Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b) and upon a finding that there is no just reason for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff A.P. Moller Maersk A/S d/b/a/ Maersk Sealand and against Defendant Tingey Trading International, Inc. in the amount of $41,886.00. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the claims not covered by Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment remain pending against Defendant. Signed by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/28/06. (erv, )
August 24, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting 13 Pla's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment . Signed by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/24/06. (erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S v. Tingey Trading International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?