Controltec, LLC et al v. Anthony Doors, Inc. et al
| 1:2006cv00295 |
| February 21, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER Regarding Custody of Exhibits and Depositions. Within 30 days of judgment or case dismissal, counsel to obtain exhibits and deposition and retain for 60 days after time to appeal or conclusion of appellate process. Signed by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/23/06. (gms, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER denying 2 Motion for TRO. The motion for TRO is converted into a 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff to serve summons, complaint and copy of motion for preliminary injunction and a copy of this order on each defendant by close of business 2/23/06. Defendants to respond to motion by 3/6/06. Plaintiff to show cause why their claims should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by 3/6/06 . Signed by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/22/06. (gms, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Controltec, LLC et al v. Anthony Doors, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
