Prince Lionheart, Inc. v. Halo Innovations, Inc.
| 1:2006cv00324 |
| February 24, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Patricia A. Coan |
| Walker D. Miller |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
217
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). The complaint and all counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay his or its own costs and attorneys' fees, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 2/16/10. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
189
MINUTE ORDER granting 188 Motion to Vacate. The 11/30/2009 trial date and 11/18/2009 trial preparation conference are vacated. Jury Trial set for 2/22/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge Walker D. Miller. Trial Preparation Conference set for 2/4/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge Walker D. Miller, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 10/22/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER granting 175 Plaintiff's Attorney J. Scott Lasater's Motion to Withdraw Ryan A. Williams as Counsel in this Matter, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 10/1/09.(ebs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Prince Lionheart, Inc. v. Halo Innovations, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
