Wyers et al v. Master Lock Company
Case Number: 1:2006cv00619
Filed: April 4, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
Presiding Judge: Lewis T. Babcock
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 378 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 373 Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery and for Sanctions Against Wyers Products Group Inc., by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/13/2012.(mjwcd)
October 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 376 ORDER. Upon the Stipulation for Stay of Execution and for Further Proceedings in this Case 375 filed 10/21/2011 and being fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED that the Stipulation for Stay of Execution and for Further Proceedings is approved and adopted as the Order of this Court. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/24/2011. (sah, )
September 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 370 ORDER. Defendant Master Lock Company's Motion Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 37(a)(3)(B)(iii) and (iv) for an order compelling Plaintiff Philip W. Wyers to fully truthfully respond to discovery requests 366 is GRANTED. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/31/2011.(sah, )
December 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 349 ORDER. On 11/15/2010 347 upon Plaintiffs Response to the Motion to Vacate Permanent Injunction 345 and Status Report 346 it was ordered that the Permanent Injunction previously entered is vacated and that the $8.5 million bond posted with this Court following the Notice of Appeal is released. It was further ordered that the Defendant shall reply to Plaintiffs request that the question of costs be deferred and the matter further stayed pending outcome of the Plaintiffs Petition for Cer tiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Defendant filed its Reply 343 calling into question the timeliness of the Plaintiffs Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Judgment enter against the Plaintiff on their claims of Patent Infringement and in favor of Defendants counterclaim for declaratory judgment finding that the patents-in-suit are invalid as a matter of law with costs to be awarded to the Defendant. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/01/2010. (sah, )
November 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 347 ORDER. The permanent injunction previously entered is VACATED. The $8.5 million bond posted with this Court following the Notice of Appeal is RELEASED. The Defendant shall reply on or before 11/29/2010 to Plaintiffs request that the question of costs be deferred and the matter further stayed pending outcome of the Plaintiffs Petition for Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/15/2010.(sah, )
July 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 333 ORDER granting 332 Motion to for approval of Supersedeas Bond by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 07/01/09.(bjrsl, )
May 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 324 ORDER REGARDING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. The Parties have stipulated and the Court does hereby ORDER that for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(b)(2), the Court hereby enters Judgment in this matter, as of the date of this order,incorporating as that Judgment the following Orders: Order, 321 , entered 05/12/2009, Order, 322 , entered 05/12/2009, and Order, 323 , entered 05/12/2009 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/21/2009. (sah, )
May 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 323 ORDER granting 291 Wyerss Motion for Pre-Judgment Interest by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/12/2009.(sah, )
May 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 320 ORDER denying 296 Wyerss Motion for Attorney Fees by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/08/2009.(sah, )
March 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 289 ORDER granting 288 joint motion of the parties to modify the Courts post-trial briefing schedule. The date by which all opening post-trial motions or briefs shall be filed remains 04/03/2009. The date by which any responses shall be filed is extended to 04/24/2009. The date by which replies shall be filed is extended to 05/01/2009 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/17/2009.(sah, )
March 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 285 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/11/2009. (sah, )
February 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 261 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION 260 Regarding Counterclaim for Declaration of Invalidity of '832 Patent by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/27/2009. (sah, )
February 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 258 ORDER. Defendants Motion in Limine to Preclude the Issue of Willfulness as a Matter of Law 215 is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence Related to Wyers Alleged Lost Profits 214 is GRANTED unconditionally. Defendants Motio n in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Past Potential Business Arrangements Between the Parties 213 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. At the hearing, Plaintiff brought to the Courts attention a prior order in an earlier case dismissing Mast er Locks claims of invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,055,832 with prejudice. The parties shall have up to and including Thursday, 02/26/2009, to file simultaneous briefs on this issue. No written response shall be allowed by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/24/2009.(sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wyers et al v. Master Lock Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?