Mitchell v. Montgomery et al
| 1:2006cv00763 |
| April 20, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER. Adopting Report and Recommendation 125 .Granting 117 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Case is dismissed in its entirety, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/29/09.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
125
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 117 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by M. A. Sosa be GRANTED and that the claim against defendant Sosa be dismissed. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/14/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER directing clerk to commence civil action and directing plaintiff to cure deficiencies within 30 days re: 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 filed by Christopher Mitchell. 28 UC 1915 motion and affidavit is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding this filing (account statement submitted does not cover the entire 6-month period). Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/20/06. (bpm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitchell v. Montgomery et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
