Mitchell v. Montgomery et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv00763
Filed: April 20, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
Presiding Judge: Wiley Y. Daniel
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER. Adopting Report and Recommendation 125 .Granting 117 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Case is dismissed in its entirety, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/29/09.(gmssl, )
August 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 125 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 117 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by M. A. Sosa be GRANTED and that the claim against defendant Sosa be dismissed. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/14/09. (erv, )
April 20, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER directing clerk to commence civil action and directing plaintiff to cure deficiencies within 30 days re: 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 filed by Christopher Mitchell. 28 UC 1915 motion and affidavit is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding this filing (account statement submitted does not cover the entire 6-month period). Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/20/06. (bpm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Montgomery et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?