Whitington v. Sokol et al
1:2006cv01245 |
June 28, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Phillip S. Figa |
Craig B Shaffer |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 283 ORDER. The 281 Joint Stipulated Motion to Substitute the Colorado Department of Corrections as a Defendant in Place of the Current Named Defendants is granted. The Colorado Department of Corrections shall be substituted as the defendant in this cas e in place of the named defendants, Kenneth Sokol, Joel Strickler, Fred Caldwell, and Anthony Johnson. The 282 Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice is granted. This case is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/29/11.(mnf, ) |
Filing 277 ORDER vacating 272 Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/23/11. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 266 ORDER: Six-Day Jury Trial set for 6/6/2011 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Trial Preparation Conference set for 5/20/2011 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/6/10. (ebs, ) |
Filing 236 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/11/10. (cbssec) |
Filing 226 COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Motion Hearing was held on 2/26/2010. ORDERED: Unopposed Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(e) for Leave to Reopen Discovery and for Status/Scheduling Conference, doc # 221 is GRANTED. Discovery due by 8/16/2010. Affirmative experts must be designated by 5/31/10. Rebuttal experts must be designated by 7/16/2010. A Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/9/2010 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. A proposed Final Pretrial Order is due 5 days prior. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd) |
Filing 216 ORDER Four-Day Jury Trial set for 10/25/2010 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Trial Preparation Conference set for 10/8/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/3/09. (ebs, ) |
Filing 200 ORDER: Mr. Whitington's Ex Parte Communication 193 shall be modified to make it a public entry and the motion related to 193 shall be terminated, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 9/9/09. (ebs, ) |
Filing 197 ORDER overruling 176 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Denying 142 State Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Denying as moot Mr. Whitington's request for counsel and an expert witness found in his Objections to the Magistrate's Recommendations 180 , by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/18/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER to Cure Deficiency re: 20 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Whitington. Signed by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 10/12/06. (bjr2, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER REOPENING CASE, Vacating 12 Order and Judgment of Dismissal, Granting 15 MOTION for Reconsideration re 12 Judgment, Granting 17 MOTION to Supplement, 14 MOTION to filed by Michael Whitington, 16 MOTION to Supplement.. Signed by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 10/6/06. (pap, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Whitington v. Sokol et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.