Harris v. Fitzgibbons et al
| 1:2006cv01642 |
| August 18, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Phillip S. Figa |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER Directing Mr. Harris to File Amended Complaint within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/15/07. (pap, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Granting 5 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff may proceed without payment of initial partial filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/8/07. (pap, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration re 6 Judgment. Vacating 6 Order Dismissing Complaint. This instant action is REOPENED. Signed by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 2/6/07.(pap, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff has 30 days to file a certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement, file the 1915 Motion on the court's proper form, and correct the captions in the Motion and the Complaint so they match . Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/16/2006. (llr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. Fitzgibbons et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
