Atwell v. Gabow et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv02262
Filed: November 13, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
Presiding Judge: John L. Kane
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 140 ORDER granting 135 Unopposed Joint Motion for Order To Re-Enter Final Judgment Pursuant To F.R.C.P. 54(b), As Required By The Tenth Circuit, And Proposed Order. Final judgment shall enter in these consolidated cases as follows: DISMISSING WITH PREJU DICE all claims of Plaintiffs Vivian Bradley, Terry Lee, Yvette Martinez Hochberg, Odin Gomez, Mekela Ridgeway, Cathie Gordon, and Katie Moore, as provided by the Courts Order dated March 31, 2008; DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE the claims of Plaintiff Re nee Atwell that were alleged under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 and under C.R.S. §25-29-107, as provided by the Courts Order dated March 31, 2008; DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE all claims against Defendants Patricia Gabow, Greg Rossman, and Wendy Alexander, in both their individual and official capacities, as provided by the Courts Order dated March 31, 2008; and DENYING Plaintiffs motion for class certification, as provided in the Courts Order dated February 28, 2008.. Signed by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/15/09.(erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atwell v. Gabow et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?