Stone v. Wheat Ridge, Colorado, City of et al
| Javier Stone |
| Hester, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, City of, Paugh, Josefik, Duane Friedlan, Jami Boyat and Larry Moorhouse |
| 1:2007cv00004 |
| January 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Patricia A. Coan |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
305
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/17/09. (wydcd, rrk)
|
|
Filing
287
MINUTE ORDER withdrawing 217 Motion in Limine; withdrawing 219 Motion to Strike entered by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/22/09. (wydcd, rrk)
|
|
Filing
244
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 179 Defendant the City of Wheat Ridge Motion for Summary Judgment; It is granted as to Plaintiffs Section 1981 claim and his Section 1983 claim for violation of substantive due process. It is denied as to Plaintiffs Section 1983 claim for violation of equal protection.; granting 180 Wheat Ridge Police Officers Paugh, Hester, and Josifek Motion for Summary Judgment. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall move to substitute Stone International Market, Inc. as the real party in interest not later than Monday, April 13, 2009. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/31/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
