Doe et al v. Berry College et al
Jane Doe |
Berry College and Marcus Sandelowsky |
Deponent #1, Deponent #2 and Deponent #3 |
Jane (1) Doe, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3, Carol (I) Willis, Carol Willis, Carrie (I) Baker and Carrie Baker |
1:2007cv00086 |
January 12, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Walker D Miller |
Craig B Shaffer |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 dd Fed. Question: Discovery Disputes |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2007. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer : Oral Motion by csl Marcus Sandelowsky to withdraw subpoenas is Granted; finding as moot 2 Motion to Quash; finding as moot 2 Motion for Protective Order; granting #4 Motion to Seal Document ; Status Conference held on 7/11/2007. (Court Reporter FTR Ben Van Dyke.) (erv, ) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER : Telephonic Status Conference set for 7/10/2007 03:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 7/2/07. (dln, ) |
Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Craig B Shaffer : Telephone Status Conference held on 2/26/2007. All matters shall remain stayed pending ruling on motion for protective order in Northern District of Georgia. Mr. Sandelowsky to alert Court and all counsel within 72 hours of ruling on the motion. (Court Reporter FTR - Ben Van Dyke.) (gms, ) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER granting #8 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings. The motion hearing set for 2/26/07 at 10:00 a.m. is CONVERTED to a Telephonic Status Conference. All further proceedings are STAYED pending the 2/26/07 telephonic status conference by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 2/2/07.(dln, ) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM regarding #8 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Movants. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer by Judge Walker D. Miller on 2/1/07. (Text Only Entry - No Document Attached)(dln, ) |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Movants Deponent #1, Deponent #2, Deponent #3. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Struble, Stephanie) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 2 MOTION to Quash, MOTION for Protective Order by Movants. A Motion Hearing set for 2/26/2007 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 1/17/07. (dln, ) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM to Magistrate Judge Shaffer advising that he will make a determination and enter appropriate orders on the Motion to Quash or alternatively for protective order. (llr, ) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM regarding #4 MOTION to Seal Document filed by Deponent #1, Deponent #2, Deponent #3, 2 MOTION to Quash MOTION for Protective Order filed by Deponent #1, Deponent #2, Deponent #3. (Text Only Entry - No Document Attached)Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer by Judge Walker D. Miller on 1/16/07. (wdmsec, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Seal by Movants Deponent #1, Deponent #2, Deponent #3. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(llr, ) |
Filing 3 RECEIPT for filing fee by Movants Deponent #1, Deponent #2, Deponent #3. Receipt #273717. (llr, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Quash, MOTION for Protective Order by Movants Deponent #1, Deponent #2, Deponent #3. (Public entry for sealed document #1 filed 1/12/07) Text only entry - no document attached. (llr, ) |
Filing 1 SEALED DOCUMENT by Movants Deponent #1, Deponent #2, Deponent #3. (llr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.