Fleming v. No Defendants Named
Michael Fleming |
Mr. Molloy, Mr. Flink and Ms. Espinoza |
1:2007cv00118 |
January 17, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Bent |
Boyd N. Boland |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 151 ORDER re: 150 Amended Complaint filed by Michael Fleming. It is hereby clarified that in light of the stipulated dismissal of Defendant Espinoza, any and all claims that are alleged against Ms. Espinoza in the Second Amended Complaint are moot and Ms. Espinoza remains terminated from this civil action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 01/20/09. (wjc, ) |
Filing 149 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer: Telephonic Status Conference held on 1/16/2009; granting 138 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Attachment to the Supplemental Brief is accepted as the Second Amended Complaint for filing as of today. (Court Reporter FTR - Ellen Miller.) (wjc, ) |
Filing 1 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff has 30 days to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or to file a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff has 30 days to file a Prisoner Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/16/2007. (llr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.