Crocs, Inc. v. Australia Unlimited, Inc.
Crocs, Inc. |
Australia Unlimited, Inc. |
Australia Unlimited, Inc. |
Crocs, Inc. |
1:2007cv00221 |
January 30, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Boulder |
Marcia S. Krieger |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 258 ORDER OF OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Should the parties desire to have the pending dispositive motions referred to a magistrate judge for final determination, they shall file a unanimous consent by all parties within ten days of the date of this Order, failing which the motions shall be determined by the undersigned. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/9/09. (msksec, ) |
Filing 29 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Marcia S. Krieger : Motion Hearing held on 2/2/2007. Denying 17 MOTION to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order. The Amended Complaint shall be filed by 2/5/2007. The TRO remains as issued and is not modified at this time. Motion for reconsideration is denied. (Court Reporter Paul Zuckerman.) (dln, ) |
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING HEARING: Motion for Forthwith Hearing is GRANTED. A Motion hearing on the Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order is set for 2/2/2007 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Signed by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/31/07. (dln, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.