Klen et al v. Loveland, City of, The, Colorado et al
Holstein Self-Service Storage, LLC, Edward J. Klen, Stephen J. Klen, Marjorie E. Klen and Diverse Construction, Inc. |
Thomas (I) Hawkinson, Loveland, City of, The, Colorado, Thomas Hawkinson, Greg (I) George, Greg George, Donald Williams, Richard (I) Hoskinson, Richard Hoskinson, John (I) R. Duval, John R. Duval, Kristine (I) Burns, Kristine Burns, David (I) Sprague, David Sprague, Jeff McKee, Cindy (I) Worayeth and Cindy Worayeth |
1:2007cv00347 |
February 16, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Larimer |
Richard P. Matsch |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 223 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The 221 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Claims Against Thomas Hawkinson, Greg George, John R. Duval and David Sprague With Prejudice is granted. Plaintiff's claims against Thomas Hawkinson, Greg George, John R. Duval and David Sprague are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own attorneys' fees and costs. The Clerk shall close this case. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/12/13.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 219 MINUTE ORDER granting 217 the Stipulated Motion to Vacate the Hearing of April 10, 2013. Dismissal documents due by 4/11/2013. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/10/2013. (mehcd) |
Filing 192 MINUTE ENTRY for Final Pretrial Conference held before Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/9/2012. 187 Motion in Limine is GRANTED; 188 Motion in Limine is DENIED with leave to renew at time of trial. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Hegarty to assist the parties in preparation of a working Final Pretrial Order. Within 14 days of the conclusion of working with Magistrate Judge Hegarty, the parties will file the new proposed Amended Pretrial Order and request a new Final Pretrial Conference. Hearing continued. Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom. (mskcd) |
Filing 177 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (1) Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment on First Amendment Retaliation Claim 158 is DENIED. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/18/12.(msksec, ) |
Filing 162 AMENDED TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL: **This Order is only amended to include the attachment omitted from the Trial Preparation Order at Docket Entry #156** by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/26/12. (msksec, ) |
Filing 161 MINUTE ORDER granting 159 the Stipulated Motion to Amend Caption. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amended the docket and caption to reflect that Kristine Burns is no longer a defendant in this action. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/10/2012. (mehcd) |
Filing 156 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/14/12. (msksec, ) |
Filing 141 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) I disqualify myself and direct the Clerk of this Court to reassign this civil action by random draw. By Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/8/2011. (sah, ) |
Filing 119 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 and 102 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted and the Clerk shall enter judgment for all defendants, dismissing all federal law claims against them and this civil action, with an award of statutory costs. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/25/2010.(rpmcd ) |
Filing 114 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 6/1/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: All state law claims are dismissed. Defendant Cindy Worayeth's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed 12/31/2009 96 , is granted and Cindy Worayeth is dismissed. Motions 97 , 98 , 99 100 , 101 and 102 are taken under advisement with respect to the remaining constitutional claims. Written order will issue. (Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd) |
Filing 106 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 1/20/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents, filed September 15, 2009 84 , is resolved pursuant to Courts ruling as stated on record. (Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd) |
Filing 92 ORDER Granting 91 Second Unopposed Motion of Defendants to Amend the Scheduling Order Regarding the Deadline to Submit Dispositive Motions. Dispositive Motions due by 12/31/2009. Parties shall have up to and including March 1, 2010 to respond to dispositive motions. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/19/2009.(rpmcd) |
Filing 90 ORDER granting 89 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The parties have up to and including 11/20/09 to submit dispositive motions. Ordered that the parties shall have up to and including 12/31/09 to respond to dispositive motions by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/27/09.(jjh, ) |
Filing 83 ORDER to Comply: counsel shall comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 as to any information to be submitted under seal based on the 82 Protective Order. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/19/2009. (rpmcd) |
Filing 80 ORDER Granting 79 The Loveland Defendants' Second Unopposed Motion to Amend 76 Scheduling Order. Parties have up to and until September 1, 2009 to designate their contradicting experts. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/13/2009.(rpmcd) Modified on 8/17/2009 to correct the year that parties have to designate their contradicting experts (jjh, ). |
Filing 78 ORDER granting 77 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Parties have to 8/15/09 to designate contradicting experts and to 9/15/09 to exchange rebuttal reports, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/15/09.(gms, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.