Caldwell et al v. Park County et al
| Charles Caldwell and Vicki Caldwell |
| Mark Damon, Gregory S. Flint, Steven Groome, Shawna Whiteowl, Monte Gore, Park County and Fred Wegener |
| Shawna Whiteowl and Mark Damon |
| Charles Caldwell and Vicki Caldwell |
| 1:2007cv00371 |
| February 22, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Park |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER Denying 58 Motion for Attorney Fees and 59 Motion for Costs. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/8/2009.(rpmcd)
|
Filing
71
ORDER Granting Park County Defendants' 70 Motion to Withdraw 63 Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs. 63 Motion is hereby deemed withdrawn. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/24/2009.(rpmcd)
|
Filing
65
ORDER to Respond: Plaintiff shall file a response to the motions for award of costs and attorneys' fees on or before March 6, 2009 re: 59 and 58 . Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/20/2009. (rpmcd)
|
Filing
56
ORDER for Judgment for Defendants Dismissing All Claims. Judgment will enter for the defendants dismissing the claims against them under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1988 and dismissing the state law claims of defamation, intentional infliction of emotional harm, invasion of privacy and unpaid wages, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/5/09. (gms, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.