Giles et al v. Gravity Play Entertainment, LLC et al
| Katherine Giles and Zurich American Insurance Company |
| Cheyenne Mountain Resort, LLC, Gravity Play Entertainment, LLC, Benchmark Hospitality, Inc., BMC - The Benchmark Management Company and Inflatable Store, Inc., The |
| 1:2007cv00401 |
| February 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Patricia A. Coan |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 149 Defendant's Motion for Clarification Regarding the Court's Order Regarding Defendant's Objections to Plaintiffs' Designations of Deposition Testimony, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/30/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER re: 145 Plaintiffs' Objections to Defendant's Counter Designation of Video Deposition Testimony of Dr. Steven Murk 138 . The Court rules on the objections as set forth in this Order, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/29/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
137
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer: Trial Preparation Conference held on 4/17/2009. Overruling 87 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; denying 115 Order on Motion in Limine; granting 116 Motion for Leave. (Court Reporter Janet Coppock) (pabcd)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER re: 108 Plaintiffs' Objections to Defendant's Designation of Deposition Testimony. The Court rules on the objections as set forth in this Order, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/15/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 The Inflatable Store's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Sixth Claim for Relief. Denying The Inflatable Store's purported Motion to Strike Exhibits 7, 8, 11, and 12 to Plaintiff's Response Brief, found at 66 The Inflatable Store's Reply Brief, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/6/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
111
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer: Motion Hearing held on 4/3/2009. 77 Motion for Order is granted. Court Reporter Janet Coppock) (pabcd)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER granting 90 Plaintiffs' Motion to Preclude Testimony at Trial of Witnesses Dr. Kathey Verdeal and Dr. Richard Hughes. TIS may not call or otherwise present the opinions of Drs. Verdeal or Hughes at trial in this matter, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/24/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
99
MINUTE ORDER Granting 97 Parties' Joint Motion re: Trial Preparation Conference and Applicability of PAB Practice Standards; Jury Trial set for 5/4/2009 08:00 AM before Judge Philip A. Brimmer, Trial Preparation Conference set for 4/17/2009 at 11:00 AM before Judge Philip A. Brimmer; Denying as moot 98 Joint Motion for Extension of Time, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/30/09.(pap, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS: Any exhibits and depositions to be used during this case, counsel for the parties shall obtain such exhibits and depositions from the Court within 30 days after any judgment is entered or closure o f the case. Counsel shall retain same for 60 days beyondthe later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. Failure to retrieve exhibits and depositions in conformance with this Order may result in their destruction. Signed by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/5/07. (dln, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
