Rogers et al v. City and County of Denver
Michael Gabriele, Robert Freund, Al Archuleta, Nick Rogers, Paul Goff, Harry Bloodworth, Wilfred Beliveau, Michael Cody, Timothy Delsordo, Cory Dunahue, Russell Dymond, Jr., Alexander M. Golston, Jeffrey Martinez, Michael Mosco, Phillip Newton and Andrew Ramirez |
City and County of Denver |
1:2007cv00541 |
March 19, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Richard P. Matsch |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 230 ORDER REGARDING RETURN OF TRIAL EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS re 205 : counsel for the respective parties shall contact the Court's courtroom deputy at (303)335-2112 to make arrangements by May 15, 2013 (30 days) for the return of all trial exhibits and depositions retained at the conclusion of the Phase II Trial to Court on December 8, 2011, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/15/2013. (rpmcd ) |
Filing 229 ORDER re 228 Status Report : this court case shall be closed. The matter can be reopened in the event of any dispute about the remaining three annual installments of attorney fees, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/11/2013. (rpmcd) |
Filing 227 ORDER : Status Report due by 4/12/2013, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/2/2013. (rpmcd) |
Filing 226 Amended 224 ORDER re 225 Motion : parties' stipulation to add and to consider timely the consents of Anthony Gallegos, John Houston and Shedrick Dobbins is granted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/15/2012.(rpmcd) |
Filing 224 ORDER re: 223 Stipulation : parties stipulation to add and to consider timely the consents of Anthony Gallegos and Shedrick Dobbins is granted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/14/2012. (rpmcd) |
Filing 222 ORDER STRIKING FILING re: 218 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/9/2012. (rpmcd) |
Filing 217 ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT, (see order for details), by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/31/2012. (rpmcd ) |
Filing 215 Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 1/24/2012 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Approval of Settlement 207 , is granted. Counsel to prepare a formal order. Court instructs counsel to electronically file actual releases. After 60 days, counsel to provide for notice to non signing plaintiffs providing 45 days to elect to pursue individual claims. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd) |
Filing 199 Amended [ 198] Courtroom Minutes (to correct title of motion): Plaintiffs' Motion for Court Determination As To Scope And Structure Of Phase II Of Trial 189 , is resolved by agreement of counsel. (rpmcd) |
Filing 188 ORDER Setting Trial to Court on Phase 2 for 12/5/2011 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/18/2011. (rpmcd) |
Filing 185 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER PHASE I TRIAL. Ordered, that the parties' motions for summary judgment are deemed motions for findings and conclusions on the separate issues presented and the rulings made will govern the further tr ial proceedings necessary for full adjudication of the claims and defenses. Ordered that the defendant's motion for decertification of collective action and to dismiss with prejudice certain plaintiffs 173 is denied by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 04/15/11. (jjh, ) |
Filing 158 ORDER Limiting Issues for Phase 1 to the Special Issues section 9 of the proposed pretrial order, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/13/10. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 146 ORDER Setting Bench Trial for 11/1/2010 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/30/2010. (rpmcd) |
Filing 139 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Defendant's motion for summary judgment on the plaintiffs' first claim and sixth claims for relief 126 is denied. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their first claim for re lief 125 is granted to the extent discussed. Defendant's motion for summary judgment on the second, third, fourth and fifth claims for relief 104 is granted in favor of the defendant on the plaintiffs' second and third claims for relief and denied on the plaintiffs' fourth and fifth claims for relief. Defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth claims for relief 112 is denied. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their seventh, eighth and ninth claims for relief 114 is denied. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their tenth claim for relief 113 is denied. Defendant's motion to strike exhibit 6 and certain paragraphs of plaintiffs' ; statement of undisputed facts in plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their tenth claim for relief 119 is denied. Plaintiffs' motion to create subclasses and select representative plaintiffs 105 is denied. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/11/2010.(rpmcd) |
Filing 137 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 4/19/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Taking under advisement motions 104 , 105 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 119 , 125 and 126 . ( Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd) |
Filing 109 ORDER Granting 108 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of time to File Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' 105 Motion to Create Subclasses and Select Representative Plaintiffs to and including July 14, 2009. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/2/2009. (rpmcd) |
Filing 101 ORDER on Defendant's 98 Motion for Protective Order: denied as to the notices concerning payroll, timekeeping and overtime and granted as to the notice concerning affirmative defenses. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/24/2009.(rpmcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.